This case takes place in Virginia and involves an unauthorized change of the terms of sale and payment between a company and its shareholders. The defendant, an attorney, took a small ownership stake in the company in exchange for legal fees. The defendant then amended the purchase agreement for the pending sale of the company, which significantly reduced the previously agreed purchase price. As a result, the company was sold for substantially less than the previously agreed upon purchasing price. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant breached his fiduciary duty and duty of loyalty, as a shareholder of the company, to both the company and the plaintiff. In addition, the plaintiff alleges that the defendant failed to advise the plaintiff and the company about the changes that were made and having failed to properly advise the plaintiff, acting contrary to the plaintiff’s interests. The plaintiff further argued that the defendant negligently acted to deprive plaintiff, as the majority shareholder, of the opportunity to sell the business in a manner that would have benefited him.
Question(s) For Expert Witness
1. Based on the brief case summary, did the defendant’s acts fall below accepted standards?
2. Have you ever served as an expert witness on a case similar to the one described above? If so, please explain.
3. Please tell us why you’re qualified to serve as an expert reviewer of this case.
Expert Witness Response E-008991
I would be happy to review the case on behalf of the plaintiff. As a professor of corporate law, I am qualified to review whether the defendant's acts fall below accepted standards and examine this case as an issue on agency and corporation law. It would seem that the defendant went way out of bounds based on the contours of the state's agency law. That being said, I would have to know the agreed distribution of authority between them before saying definitively. Additionally, I have both a Ph.D. in Economics and a Law degree. Attorneys have hired me to render an opinion as an economist on economic matters. Perhaps similar issues are at stake in this case. I'm happy to explore that possibility.
About the author
Joseph O'Neill
Joe has extensive experience in online journalism and technical writing across a range of legal topics, including personal injury, meidcal malpractice, mass torts, consumer litigation, commercial litigation, and more. Joe spent close to six years working at Expert Institute, finishing up his role here as Director of Marketing. He has considerable knowledge across an array of legal topics pertaining to expert witnesses. Currently, Joe servces as Owner and Demand Generation Consultant at LightSail Consulting.
