Pharmaceutical IP Experts Opine on Royalty Payments for Drug Patent Holder

ByJoseph O'Neill

Updated on

Pharmaceutical IP Experts Opine on Royalty Payments for Drug Patent Holder

Case Overview

The case involves a licensing dispute centered in the state of Georgia involving the formulation and testing of a drug that treats neurologic conditions. The drug is a combination of two existing medications, which have been combined into a single therapy. The patent holder and manufacturer of these existing medications claimed that they should receive a greater amount of royalty payments for the new drug. The manufacturer of the new therapy has claimed that the royalty and licensing payments made to the original inventor of the component drugs are sufficient.

About the author

Joseph O'Neill

Joseph O'Neill

Joe is a seasoned expert in online journalism and technical writing, with a wealth of experience covering a diverse range of legal topics. His areas of expertise include personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, consumer litigation, and commercial litigation. During his nearly six years at Expert Institute, Joe honed his skills and knowledge, culminating in his role as Director of Marketing. He developed a deep understanding of the intricacies of expert witness testimony and its implications in various legal contexts. His contributions significantly enhanced the company's marketing strategies and visibility within the legal community. Joe's extensive background in legal topics makes him a valuable resource for understanding the complexities of expert witness involvement in litigation. He is a graduate of Dickinson College.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.