Patient Suffers Fatal Hemorrhage While on Coumadin

ByJoseph O'Neill

Updated on

Patient Suffers Fatal Hemorrhage While on Coumadin

Case Overview

This case involves a middle-aged male patient who passed away shortly after undergoing a cardiac catheterization procedure. A week before the incident in question, the patient presented to the emergency room with complaints of chest pain and shortness of breath. A chest X-ray as well as an EKG revealed multiple troubling findings, and the patient was admitted to the hospital. The patient was taking Coumadin at the time for deep vein thrombosis. He discontinued Coumadin for the procedure, bridging with another medication until the procedure was complete. He underwent cardiac catheterization and was diagnosed with moderate coronary artery disease, however the procedure was largely uneventful and the patient was recommended for discharge home. A few hours before the patient was set to leave the hospital, however, his blood pressure suddenly plummeted. Treating physicians suspected hypovolemic shock, which was confirmed by a CT scan that revealed an internal hemorrhage. The patient was taken off of his anticoagulant medication and given a number of different blood products, however no surgical intervention was undertaken. The patient’s condition continued to deteriorate until he was eventually diagnosed with multiorgan failure and treatment was discontinued. It was alleged that the cardiac catheterization procedure was mishandled, and eventually led to the patient’s death

Questions to the Cardiology expert and their responses

Q1

Do you routinely treat patients similar to the one described in the case and perform cardiac catheterization? If so how often?

I regularly treat patients who are similar to the case described, and I perform cardiac catheterization a minimum of three days a week. My yearly procedure count is between 700-750 cases including cardiac, cerebral, and peripheral cases.

Q2

Have you ever had a patient develop the outcome described in the case? If so, please explain.

I believe this patient may have had a better outcome if the care was rendered differently. If the cardiac catheterization was performed via radial access, then the retroperitoneal bleed could not have possibly been caused by the cardiac catheterization. Furthermore, the morning after catheterization, the patient's blood count showed a significant drop from 36% to 31%. If it is determined that the catheterization did not cause the bleed, then there is still the issue of the physician not picking up on the significant blood loss. I would like to learn more, ie. the access site used to perform cardiac catheterization and, if femoral, was a closure device used or not.

About the expert

This highly qualified and board-certified Interventional Cardiologist received his M.D. from the American University of Beirut. He went on to complete residency in Internal Medicine at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, a fellowship in Interventional Cardiology at Vanderbilt University, and a Fellowship in Cardiovascular Diseases at the University Texas Health Science Center. He is certified in Internal Medicine and Interventional Cardiology by the American Board of Internal Medicine and in Nuclear Cardiology by the American Board of Nuclear Cardiology. This expert has authored 30+ publications in peer-reviewed publications in the field. Currently, he is an Assistant Professor of Medicine at a high-ranking major university as well as the Director of Cardiovascular Catheterization Laboratory and Attending Interventional Cardiologist at major university affiliated hospital.

Expert headshot

E-009217

Specialties:

About the author

Joseph O'Neill

Joseph O'Neill

Joe is a seasoned expert in online journalism and technical writing, with a wealth of experience covering a diverse range of legal topics. His areas of expertise include personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, consumer litigation, and commercial litigation. During his nearly six years at Expert Institute, Joe honed his skills and knowledge, culminating in his role as Director of Marketing. He developed a deep understanding of the intricacies of expert witness testimony and its implications in various legal contexts. His contributions significantly enhanced the company's marketing strategies and visibility within the legal community. Joe's extensive background in legal topics makes him a valuable resource for understanding the complexities of expert witness involvement in litigation. He is a graduate of Dickinson College.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.