Neurology Experts Discuss Botched Biopsy of Brain Lesion

ByJoseph O'Neill

Updated on

Neurology Experts Discuss Botched Biopsy of Brain Lesion

This case involves a middle-aged male patient who presented to the hospital with signs of neurological injury. After undergoing imaging studies, doctors discovered the presence of a lesion on the man’s brain, which they elected to biopsy. However, during the biopsy, the patient developed a hemorrhage that resulted in severe and permanent injuries, including left sided paralysis as well as speech defects. It was eventually determined that the man was suffering from multiple sclerosis in addition to his injuries from the biopsy.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

1. How frequently do you evaluate and diagnose patients with multiple sclerosis?

2. What is the typical workup for a solitary intracranial lesion causing hemiparesis and speech difficulties?

3. What imaging findings would make you suspicious of tumefactive MS as the underlying cause of such symptoms?

Expert Witness Response E-055292

inline imageTumefactive MS can be very difficult to distinguish from a tumor- as the name implies. This would especially be the case in a middle-aged man. I have sent a handful of such patients for a biopsy and would do so again if necessary. The biggest clue was that a tumefactive lesion was MS (not a real tumor) would be the presence of other lesions. Without seeing the MRI, it is hard to say. But a single, large lesion causing weakness and speech problems sounds typical for a tumor, and biopsies are needed to diagnose these- though the location for this biopsy is not ideal. I would have to see the films myself to judge, but I can imagine many doctors thinking a biopsy is the right thing to do.

About the author

Joseph O'Neill

Joseph O'Neill

Joe is a seasoned expert in online journalism and technical writing, with a wealth of experience covering a diverse range of legal topics. His areas of expertise include personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, consumer litigation, and commercial litigation. During his nearly six years at Expert Institute, Joe honed his skills and knowledge, culminating in his role as Director of Marketing. He developed a deep understanding of the intricacies of expert witness testimony and its implications in various legal contexts. His contributions significantly enhanced the company's marketing strategies and visibility within the legal community. Joe's extensive background in legal topics makes him a valuable resource for understanding the complexities of expert witness involvement in litigation. He is a graduate of Dickinson College.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.