Homeowner Disputes Foreclosure, Cites Institutional Incompetence

ByJoseph O'Neill

Updated on

Homeowner Disputes Foreclosure, Cites Institutional Incompetence

The plaintiff in this case is the owner of the property located in Montana where the plaintiff has lived with her family for many years. The defendant seeks to foreclose on the property allegedly without legitimate basis. It is alleged that the default that triggered the notice of the trustee’s sale and the sale date came as the result of defendant’s intentional misconduct or institutional incompetence. The plaintiff claims that she has paid her mortgage in full, and has submitted all the paperwork requested by defendant throughout the course of the loan repayment period. Plaintiff paid her mortgage in full every month until, for reasons that remain unexplained, the defendant refused to accept plaintiff’s payments. It is this refusal to accept plaintiff’s payments which placed plaintiff in the alleged default. The plaintiff and her family now face the prospect of losing their home to foreclosure.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

1. Please explain your qualifications to review this case.

2. Are you familiar with the protocols major banks have in place to ensure transparency and proper documentation of all transactions with customers? Please explain

Expert Witness Response E-013466

inline imageThere is likely some piece of information missing. The problem with borrower cases is that they will say they made all of their payments in full and on time, but often when a full review is done, that was not the case. My initial questions would include the following: who was responsible for the escrows - i.e., hazard insurance and property taxes - and were they up to date? Were the borrower's payments returned to sender or were they put in a suspense account? Has a Qualified Written Request per RESPA section 6 been made to obtain all servicing records including origination documents, payment histories, and escrow account balances? Banks are not generally in the business of refusing payments made in full and on time, so unless the bank has made a rare and egregious error, the borrower is not disclosing everything.

About the author

Joseph O'Neill

Joseph O'Neill

Joe is a seasoned expert in online journalism and technical writing, with a wealth of experience covering a diverse range of legal topics. His areas of expertise include personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, consumer litigation, and commercial litigation. During his nearly six years at Expert Institute, Joe honed his skills and knowledge, culminating in his role as Director of Marketing. He developed a deep understanding of the intricacies of expert witness testimony and its implications in various legal contexts. His contributions significantly enhanced the company's marketing strategies and visibility within the legal community. Joe's extensive background in legal topics makes him a valuable resource for understanding the complexities of expert witness involvement in litigation. He is a graduate of Dickinson College.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.