This construction case takes place in Nevada and involves a subcontractor that allegedly provided faulty materials and installation services. The plaintiffs were engaged in the construction of a large warehouse facility that required the use of steel roof trusses. As a result, the plaintiffs entered into a contract with defendants for the fabrication, supply and installation of all components related to the steel roofing system. Upon receiving the construction materials, employees of the plaintiff construction company noticed that multiple roofing components contained significant structural defects, and would be unsafe to install as provided. It is alleged that the plaintiff used parts from a military aircraft surplus that was haphazardly melted down, and thus failed to supply suitable and acceptable materials that complied with the prime contract, while also failing to deliver materials in accordance with the defendant’s construction schedule. The plaintiff has failed and refused to pay defendants for the damage.