Failure to Monitor Coumadin Regimen Leads to Death

ByJoseph O'Neill

Updated on

Failure to Monitor Coumadin Regimen Leads to Death

This case takes place in California and involves a male patient who was prescribed a daily dosage of Coumadin without specific follow-up for routine lab studies. Some weeks after beginning the Coumadin regimen, the patient presented to the defendant physician with complaints of bruising. While the patient was bleeding internally, no thorough workup was ordered to evaluate the patient – instead, he was promptly discharged. No lab studies were ordered by the evaluating physician. A few days later, the patient presented to the ER where he expired as a result of internal bleeding. His INR hadn’t been monitored and it is alleged that if it were, earlier intervention or discontinuation of the Coumadin regimen would have likely resulted in a far better outcome for the patient.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

1. Do you treat similar patients?

2. Based on summary, was there anything that could have been done to avoid the outcome? Please explain

Expert Witness Response E-024085

inline imageMonitoring of Warfarin therapy by obtaining laboratory testing (mainly the INR) is indicated and agreed upon by many professional societies, including ASH (American Society and Hematology), and is standard of care. My initial thoughts, without the ability to look at the patient's chart, are that routine monitoring of the patient's INR would likely have indicated a toxic dose of Warfarin, and the provider could have decreased the dose of this medication (per standard dosing guidelines) to prevent any bleeding sequelae, or even given an anecdote if required for bleeding, such as vitamin K or a prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC).

About the author

Joseph O'Neill

Joseph O'Neill

Joe is a seasoned expert in online journalism and technical writing, with a wealth of experience covering a diverse range of legal topics. His areas of expertise include personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, consumer litigation, and commercial litigation. During his nearly six years at Expert Institute, Joe honed his skills and knowledge, culminating in his role as Director of Marketing. He developed a deep understanding of the intricacies of expert witness testimony and its implications in various legal contexts. His contributions significantly enhanced the company's marketing strategies and visibility within the legal community. Joe's extensive background in legal topics makes him a valuable resource for understanding the complexities of expert witness involvement in litigation. He is a graduate of Dickinson College.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.