This case involves a ten-year-old male patient who was taken to the hospital by EHS with vomiting, fever, and left lower leg pain after injuring himself in a basketball game. The patient was worked up by the emergency room (ER) physician and diagnosed with dehydration. The patient was discharged with instructions to follow up with his primary care physician in the event any new symptoms arise. A few days later, the patient was readmitted to the hospital after experiencing a bout of intractable vomiting. His working diagnosis and admission was now supported on the basis of septic shock. He was transferred to the intensive care unit but was unable to be properly resuscitated. The patient fell into severe sepsis with multiple organ dysfunction and expired five days after he presented to the emergency room.
Question(s) For Expert Witness
1. Should this patient have been more extensively evaluated upon his first emergency room visit and what is the standard of care in diagnosing sepsis?
Expert Witness Response E-000781
SIRS is the body’s natural response to any insult of infectious or noninfectious origin. Sepsis can be diagnosed once the criteria for SIRS is met, and the responsible insult is identified. In order to completely evaluate for SIRS, a number of tests must be done. These include blood cultures, urinalysis and culture, cardiac enzymes, amylase, lipase spinal fluid, and liver profiles. Routine screenings can also be run, as well as other, more specific lab tests based on the patient's history and physical exam findings. In the event of pediatric cases of sepsis, it is important to note that sepsis may present with other complications of infection without meeting the exact SIRS criteria.
About the author
Michael Talve, CEO
Michael Talve stands at the forefront of legal innovation as the CEO and Managing Director of Expert Institute. Under his leadership, the Expert Institute has established itself as a vital player in the legal technology arena, revolutionizing how lawyers connect with world-class experts and access advanced legal technology. Michael's role involves not only steering the company's strategic direction but also ensuring the delivery of unparalleled intelligence and cutting-edge solutions to legal professionals. His work at Expert Institute has been instrumental in enhancing the capabilities of attorneys in case preparation and execution, making a significant impact on the legal industry's approach to expert consultation and technological integration. Michael's vision and execution have positioned the Expert Institute as a key facilitator in the intersection of law and technology.
