Drug Manufacturer Allegedly Fails To Meet FDA Labeling Standards

This case involves an otherwise healthy 39-year-old woman with a history of trouble conceiving who was told by her physician that taking Vitamin E supplements could increase her chance of conception.

ByJohn Lomicky

Updated on

Drug Manufacturer Allegedly Fails To Meet FDA Labeling Standards

The woman purchased a bottle of over-the-counter Vitamin E supplements manufactured by the defendant pharmaceutical company. After taking several doses of Vitamin E, the woman experienced nausea, stomach cramps, and violent diarrhea, which led to her sudden death. Upon autopsy, her system was clean except for the Vitamin E. The pathologist linked the death to Vitamin E toxicity. It was alleged that the warning label on the Vitamin E bottle did not sufficiently caution against the dangers of consuming too much Vitamin E. An expert familiar with over-the-counter drugs was to review the warnings and determine if they were adequate enough to meet FDA standards.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

Please describe your experience with warning label regulation for OTC products.

How would you determine if the language in the warning was sufficient enough to stop this type of incident from happening?

Expert Witness Response E-065690

inline imageI have worked for the FDA for 29 years. I am very familiar with FDA regulations as they relate to OTC drugs. The FDA publishes monographs which describe the types of ingredients allowed to be in stimulant products. Depending upon how the product is labeled and its intended use, I may be able to determine if the product falls under the category of an OTC or dietary supplement. It is important to differentiate between these two categories as the requirements differ significantly with respect to warnings and labeling. I have reviewed many dietary supplement cases (including ephedra cases before specific limits were enacted) and OTC drug cases in my years with the FDA and have written many warning letters and submitted numerous successful seizure and injunctions for regulatory action.

About the author

John Lomicky

John Lomicky

John Lomicky is a J.D. candidate at FSU Law with a multidisciplinary background. He earned his Bachelor's degree in Neurobiology and Near Eastern Studies from Georgetown University and has graduate degrees in International Business and Eurasian Studies. His extensive professional experience includes significant contributions in legal business development and research.

At Expert Institute, John held several key roles over five years, including Director of Business Development, where he oversaw an inside sales team, generating six-figure monthly revenue and fostering relationships with a diverse range of legal practices, including top-tier firms and solo practitioners. As Associate Director of Research, he led the company's first physical expansion, establishing a successful operation in California and managing a team of over 20 research and sales professionals. In his role as Associate in Research, he provided tailored consulting services to attorney clients across North America, connecting them with the right experts for cases in various fields, including personal injury and intellectual property,

John's expertise spans managing sales teams and driving company expansion, developing consultative services tailored to legal practices, and cultivating strong relationships within the legal community.

He is currently pursuing a JD/LLM in Tax at the University of Florida - Fredric G. Levin College of Law, where he is involved with the Florida Tax Moot Court Team and the Low-Income Taxpayer Clinic.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.