Doctors Misdiagnose Serious Cancer as Low-Grade Adenocarcinoma

ByJoseph O'Neill

Updated on

Doctors Misdiagnose Serious Cancer as Low-Grade Adenocarcinoma

Case Overview

This case involves a middle-aged female patient who underwent a hysterectomy after a growth was discovered and originally diagnosed as a low-grade adenocarcinoma. Some time later, the Plaintiff was seen by another physician who performed additional testing, who determined the mass to be a serous carcinoma. The patient did not receive any follow-up or chemotherapy after the surgery due to the presumed low-grade nature of the mass. Some time later, the patient began to manifest shortness of breath, which was determined to be linked to the development of metastatic lung cancer from the patient’s original mass.

Questions to the Gynecology expert and their responses

Q1

Should the testing have been done during the original resection procedure?

The testing done here is not standard for endometrial cancer diagnostics. Determination of serous carcinoma is based on H&E staining, not p53 stain. p53 over expression in an apparent endometrioid carcinoma is insufficient for determination of serous carcinoma. A GYN pathology expert is more appropriate for answering this question.

Q2

Would earlier detection have altered this patients treatment plan?

Most gyn-oncologists would give chemotherapy to a stage 1 serous cancer. However, many would not have if the lesion had been confined to a polyp. There is not a uniformly accepted standard. Many clinicians would have re-operated and re-staged a serous cancer treated only with hysterectomy, removing lymph nodes and doing peritoneal biopsies. Had these been abnormal, then treatment would definitely have been instituted (chemotherapy +/- radiation, depending on results). However, the fact that disease has only recurred in this area suggests that biopsies would have been negative and treatment would not have changed.

About the expert

This expert is board certified in obstetrics, gynecology and gynecologic oncology. This expert is active in both clinical practice and research, as well as public service. This peer-reviewed expert is a member of the top gynecological societies in the country and is well known for his work in gynecological oncology. His clinical interests include cervical cancer, breast cancer and cancer prevention.

Expert headshot

E-006779

Specialties:

About the author

Joseph O'Neill

Joseph O'Neill

Joe is a seasoned expert in online journalism and technical writing, with a wealth of experience covering a diverse range of legal topics. His areas of expertise include personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, consumer litigation, and commercial litigation. During his nearly six years at Expert Institute, Joe honed his skills and knowledge, culminating in his role as Director of Marketing. He developed a deep understanding of the intricacies of expert witness testimony and its implications in various legal contexts. His contributions significantly enhanced the company's marketing strategies and visibility within the legal community. Joe's extensive background in legal topics makes him a valuable resource for understanding the complexities of expert witness involvement in litigation. He is a graduate of Dickinson College.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.