Construction Safety Expert Evaluates Fatal Extension Ladder Accident

ByJoseph O'Neill

Updated on

Construction Safety Expert Evaluates Fatal Extension Ladder Accident

Case Overview

This case involves a plaintiff who was severely injured while trying to attach a ladder to the side of a steel beam office building that was under construction. It was the worker’s first day at the job site, and the building was in the early stages of construction, with the building’s I-beams exposed to the elements. The steel beams had been coated with a protective layer of clear coating that was still drying at the time of the accident. The decedent attempted to place an extension ladder against one of the beams from the ground 20 feet below. As the decedent reached the top of the ladder it slipped on the wet coating, causing the ladder and the decedent to fall to the ground. The man was killed on impact with the ground. It was claimed that the ladder lacked critical safety features, including proper tie-offs, at the time of the accident.

Questions to the Construction Safety expert and their responses

Q1

Please describe your experience overseeing construction sites.

Over the course of my professional career, I have had the opportunity to visit thousands of active construction sites. This includes working directly with numerous contractors involved in the construction of bridges. I have assisted companies in the development and implementation of relevant policies and procedures, as well as associated employee training. I can speak to the standard of care for the general contractor and each individual contractor is defined as a legal matter and as an operational matter.

Q2

Are you familiar with steel beams and the proper way to use them?

I have a strong familiarity with steel beams.

Q3

What could have been done differently to prevent this from happening?

It is often the case that alternatives exist to the operations, conditions, tools, and equipment that were in use at the time of an accident. While I do not know the specifics of why this happened in this specific case, it is sometimes true that factors such as cost, access, project timing, and other relevant factors are re-evaluated after a conclusion. A proper job/task analysis completed at any time prior to this accident would have indicated the safest and best approach to each operation.

About the expert

This qualified expert of Safety Management obtained his BS in Safety and Accident Prevention from Illinois State University. He is Certified as a Safety Professional, in Risk Management, OSHA, and Emergency Planning. He is a member of several Safety Professional Societies and Associations and he is currently the Vice President of a Safety Management Consulting Firm.

Expert headshot

E-008566

Specialties:

About the author

Joseph O'Neill

Joseph O'Neill

Joe is a seasoned expert in online journalism and technical writing, with a wealth of experience covering a diverse range of legal topics. His areas of expertise include personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, consumer litigation, and commercial litigation. During his nearly six years at Expert Institute, Joe honed his skills and knowledge, culminating in his role as Director of Marketing. He developed a deep understanding of the intricacies of expert witness testimony and its implications in various legal contexts. His contributions significantly enhanced the company's marketing strategies and visibility within the legal community. Joe's extensive background in legal topics makes him a valuable resource for understanding the complexities of expert witness involvement in litigation. He is a graduate of Dickinson College.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.