Chiropractic Manipulation Allegedly Leads to Permanent Injuries

ByJoseph O'Neill

Updated on

Chiropractic Manipulation Allegedly Leads to Permanent Injuries

This case involves a young female patient in North Dakota who sought chiropractic treatment for chronic back pain, which she had endured for several months. She received a chiropractic spinal manipulation and adjustment the day before the incident in question. The following day the patient presented to the emergency room after experiencing a loss of sensation on her right side, and was investigated for stroke. Despite immediate treatment with tPA, the patient’s condition continued to deteriorate, and she was left with severe and permanent disabilities. It was alleged that the woman’s stroke was caused by the chiropractic manipulation.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

1. Do you routinely perform neck manipulations?

2. Should patients be warned about the risks of neck manipulation?

Expert Witness Response E-009668

inline imageI currently teach full-time at a major chiropractic college where I teach students how to apply safe and effective neck manipulation, and I routinely perform neck manipulation on colleagues and students. The issue is complicated. Based on current evidence, the causal relationship between neck manipulation and stroke is still controversial. In the absence of specific risk factors, I do not believe the evidence supports the necessity of routinely warning patients of the risk of stroke from neck manipulation. However, if a patient presents with specific risk factors informed consent is necessary. This means a chiropractor must perform a thorough history and examination to rule out these risk factors. Many of these cases hinge on the thoroughness and appropriateness of the chiropractor's pre-treatment evaluation. In this case, it is unclear whether this patient had specific neck-related complaints that would indicate the neck manipulation was appropriate. In the absence of any significant neck complaints, neck manipulation would not be appropriate. Since any benefit of neck manipulation would be unclear, I believe specific informed consent discussing possible risks would be required.

About the author

Joseph O'Neill

Joseph O'Neill

Joe is a seasoned expert in online journalism and technical writing, with a wealth of experience covering a diverse range of legal topics. His areas of expertise include personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, consumer litigation, and commercial litigation. During his nearly six years at Expert Institute, Joe honed his skills and knowledge, culminating in his role as Director of Marketing. He developed a deep understanding of the intricacies of expert witness testimony and its implications in various legal contexts. His contributions significantly enhanced the company's marketing strategies and visibility within the legal community. Joe's extensive background in legal topics makes him a valuable resource for understanding the complexities of expert witness involvement in litigation. He is a graduate of Dickinson College.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.