Botched Steroid Injection Results in Permanent Injuries

ByJoseph O'Neill

|

Updated onJanuary 5, 2018

Botched Steroid Injection Results in Permanent Injuries

This case involves a woman who consented to have a epidural steroid injection performed; however, the doctor instead performed an interlaminar epidural steroid injection. The doctor performed a procedure the man did not consent to and also negligently performed the procedure. It was alleged that the patient suffered personal injury as a result of the improper and negligently performed procedure. She experienced severe pain for approximately more than 2 weeks following the procedure, and continued to suffer from residual pain, headaches, and atrophy in her lower extremities.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

1. How often do you perform both transforaminal epidural steroid injections and interlaminar epidural steroid injections?

Expert Witness Response E-024812

inline imageI perform 20-40 transforaminal (TFESI) and/or interlaminar epidural steroid injections (ILESI) every week as a part of my interventional pain medicine practice. The risks associated with both TFESI and ILESI are extremely similar, as both involve needle entry into the epidural space, albeit from different anatomical approaches using different techniques. Procedural risks include, but are not limited to, post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) potentially related to a CSF leak, direct neurological trauma, vascular injection, seizure, permanent nerve injury, worsened pain, no benefit, and infection. All of these should be discussed with the patient, and included on an appropriate informed consent form. It is not uncommon for the interventionalist to change the procedure while the patient is on the fluoroscopic table if fluoro images indicate that the planned approach (TFESI vs ILESI) may be too difficult or not as beneficial, although this must either be consented for in advance, or discussed directly with the patient at that time before proceeding. The described injuries reported in this case involve known potential risks (e.g. PDPH, headache) but also muscle atrophy which, if objectively seen in exam, would presumably indicate severe peripheral or central neurological injury and are obviously not expected outcomes from properly performed TFESI or ILESI.

About the author

Joseph O'Neill

Joseph O'Neill

Joe has extensive experience in online journalism and technical writing across a range of legal topics, including personal injury, meidcal malpractice, mass torts, consumer litigation, commercial litigation, and more. Joe spent close to six years working at Expert Institute, finishing up his role here as Director of Marketing. He has considerable knowledge across an array of legal topics pertaining to expert witnesses. Currently, Joe servces as Owner and Demand Generation Consultant at LightSail Consulting.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?