$1.6B Verdict in Texas Refinery Explosion Wrongful Death Case

A Starr County jury awarded over $1.6 billion against Upton Assets LLC for two deaths in a 2023 Pecos facility explosion.

ByZach Barreto

Published on

explosion

A Starr County jury has returned a verdict exceeding $1.6 billion for the families of two workers killed in an October 2023 explosion at the Pecos Liquids Handling Facility, a hazardous materials processing site in Pecos, Texas. The case centered on allegations that the facility’s owner, Upton Assets LLC, failed to implement federally required safety systems applicable to operations handling highly hazardous chemicals. The award included substantial punitive damages, reflecting jurors’ findings on both causation and the degree of misconduct. The matter also unfolded against significant financial pressure on the company, which sought Chapter 11 protection shortly before the verdict was reached, positioning post-trial collection and bankruptcy issues as immediate next-stage disputes.

The Explosion and Wrongful Death Allegations

The families of Reinaldo Garcia Peña, 57, and Angel Alaffa, 30, pursued wrongful death claims arising from an explosion on Oct. 7, 2023, at the Pecos Liquids Handling Facility. According to the lawsuit, the incident occurred when Alaffa attempted to begin welding at a silo that had not been properly cleared of highly flammable chemicals despite assurances that it was safe. Court filings described the ignition of the torch as the triggering event for a rapid and violent explosion, killing both workers. The pleadings also described preceding conditions at the site, including an earlier spill involving liquid hydrocarbons in a containment area and alleged representations by a contractor that the area had been rendered safe for work.

A central theme at trial was whether Upton Assets LLC adhered to required industrial safety controls for a Process Safety Management (PSM) facility. The plaintiffs asserted that PSM obligations demanded formal training, documented procedures, and maintained safety protocols tailored to the hazardous substances on site. They further alleged Peña and Alaffa did not receive safety training or safety manuals, and that they were dispatched to perform hot work with monitoring equipment that could not detect the vapors implicated in the explosion. The claim narrative also included assertions of wage-related irregularities, offered to support a broader picture of operational disregard and inadequate oversight.

Trial Evidence on Safety Governance and Negligence

After a two-week trial, jurors found Upton Assets LLC negligent and concluded that ignored safety regulations directly contributed to the deaths. Evidence emphasized the facility’s governance and the extent to which management understood, implemented, or enforced PSM-related requirements—issues that often drive the retention of engineering expert witnesses in industrial incident litigation. The owner, Thomas Oliver Hanks Jr., testified under oath that he “had never read” the safety manuals that were intended to guide operations at his own facility. Plaintiffs argued the admission supported an inference that key written controls existed in name only and were not translated into operational practices capable of preventing foreseeable ignition hazards during welding.

The plaintiffs also presented allegations that on-site management lacked the qualifications and training expected for a PSM-regulated operation, and that workers were not provided with adequate instruction on the specific risks associated with the chemicals and confined spaces involved. In that framework, the jury’s liability findings turned on a claimed sequence: hazardous material remained in the silo; the work was nonetheless authorized; warning systems and detection tools were insufficient; and the hot work created an ignition source. The victims’ families were represented by Ammons Law Firm, according to court filings.

Damages, Punitive Award, and Bankruptcy Timing

The verdict allocated more than $1.6 billion combined to the two families, with compensatory damages awarded for losses to spouses, children, and parents, and punitive damages intended to punish and deter. For Peña’s family, the jury awarded a total of $812 million, including $101.5 million in compensatory damages to his wife of 37 years and $50.75 million to each of his two daughters, along with $609 million in punitive damages. For Alaffa’s family, jurors awarded $200 million in compensatory damages to his widow, their minor daughter, and his parents, plus $609 million in punitive damages. The size of the punitive component signals that jurors accepted a narrative of more than inadvertence, concluding the conduct warranted enhanced civil sanctions under Texas standards.

Post-verdict, attention is likely to concentrate on the interplay between the judgment and Upton Assets LLC’s Chapter 11 filing. The company sought bankruptcy protection on April 6, approximately two weeks before the jury’s unanimous verdict. In practice, bankruptcy can shift litigation from state-court enforcement to the bankruptcy court’s claims and priority framework, raising questions about the treatment of wrongful death claims, available insurance, and whether punitive damages are collectible from estate assets. While the verdict resolves liability and damages at the trial level, the bankruptcy timeline suggests that payment mechanics and potential appeals will significantly influence the ultimate recovery, including how parties may calculate or prove damages in subsequent proceedings.


About the author

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto is a distinguished professional in the legal industry, currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Research at the Expert Institute. With a deep understanding of a broad range of legal practice areas, Zach's expertise encompasses personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, and defective products. His skills are particularly evident in handling complex litigation matters, including high-profile cases such as opioids litigation, NFL concussion litigation, California wildfires, 3M earplugs, Elmiron, transvaginal mesh, Roundup, Camp Lejeune, hernia mesh, IVC filters, Paraquat, Paragard, talcum powder, and Zantac.

Under his leadership, the Expert Institute’s research team has expanded impressively from a single member to a robust team of 100 professionals over the last decade. This growth reflects his ability to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of legal research and expert recruitment effectively. Zach has been instrumental in working on nationally significant litigation matters, including cases involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toxic chemical exposure, and wrongful death, among others.

At the Expert Institute, Zach is responsible for managing all aspects of the research department and developing strategic institutional relationships. He plays a key role in equipping attorneys for success through expert consulting, case management, strategic research, and expert due diligence provided by the Institute’s cloud-based legal services platform, Expert iQ. Zach holds a Bachelor's Degree in Political Science and European History from Vanderbilt University.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.