Sex-Trafficking Victims Awarded More Than $24M In Arbitration

An arbitrator found the motel owner responsible for the human trafficking operations that occurred on the property.

Motel exterior

ByKandace Watkins, J.D.

|

Published on April 16, 2024

Motel exterior

The Background

In 2013, sex traffickers forced two young women, going by the initials B.H. and C.A. in court documents, into prostitution at the ages of 16 and 17. For two weeks, the traffickers took B.H., age 17, to the North American Motor Inns on City Avenue in Philadelphia. C.A., age 16, was trafficked from the same location for nearly a year.

At the motel, the victims suffered severe and constant violence and sexual abuse from the traffickers and unknown customers. The traffickers drugged the victims and threatened to kill their families if they did not cooperate. If the victims did not meet their quotas for the day, the traffickers would beat, smack, burn, and kick them.

In May 2013, B.H. escaped her trafficker, and in October 2013, the FBI recovered C.A. in Northeast Philadelphia. A judge found the traffickers guilty of their criminal activities and sentenced them to prison.

The Allegations

In March 2019, the victims, represented by Nadeem Bezar and Emily Marks of Kline & Specter PC, filed a lawsuit against the owner of North American Motor Inns, Ramara, Inc. They alleged that the motel owner was responsible for the human trafficking operations that occurred on its property. The victims’ attorneys argued that the motel owner was aware of the criminal activity present at the motel and was negligent in not working to prevent it.

On the other hand, Ramara, Inc., represented by Hugh P. O'Neill and John A. Lucy of Thomas Thomas & Hafer LLP, argued that the plaintiffs did not establish that they breached a duty of care to the victims. According to Ramara’s attorneys, another company leased the hotel at the time of sex trafficking and was responsible for the activity that occurred on the premises.

According to Ramara, they were merely a landlord in possession of the property during the time in question. They argued that Ramara did not have employees at the motel and did not maintain a daily presence at the time.

The Arbitration Award and The Takeaway

The parties entered into arbitration before William Ricci of Ricci Tyrrell Johnson & Grey. The arbitrator found that the motel owner breached its duty of care and awarded $12 million and $12.5 million to the victims, respectively, to be paid by Ramara Inc.

The bravery of the victims led to a significant victory in holding business owners accountable for criminal activity on their premises. Criminal sex trafficking cases are difficult to investigate and prosecute. Moreover, the judgment does not always help make the victims whole. However, proving that a business owner was negligent in failing to prevent sex trafficking on its premises helps prevent sex trafficking, share accountability, and make victims whole.

About the author

Kandace Watkins, J.D.

Kandace Watkins, J.D.

Kandace Watkins, J.D., is distinguished in the field of financial regulatory compliance, employment law, and workers' compensation law. Kandace earned her J.D. from the University of North Carolina School of Law.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.