Rule 26, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Disclosure Guide for Expert Witnesses

Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP 26) provides a basic outline for expert witness reports that can be helpful for a first-time expert to review.

Outside of a court

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure’s Rule 26 and the Duty to Disclose

Overall, the Rules can provide information about proceedings that may help orient an expert witness to the process.

Rule 26 covers a number of details related to the parties’ duty to disclose certain information to one another. This rule includes the responsibility for the disclosure of witnesses, including information about witnesses each party intends to call at trial.

In Rule 26(a)(2), the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide rules for disclosing expert witnesses. Subsection (A) creates a duty to disclose “the identity of any witness [a party] may use at trial to present evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, 703 or 705.”

Because 26(a)(2) specifies “any witness [a party] may use at trial,” it may not apply to every expert. For example, an attorney may consult with an expert for the attorney’s education or information. Under this rule, this may not be an expert the FRCP requires attorneys to disclose.

What Expert Reports Need, According to Rule 26

Rule 26(a)(2)(B) requires that expert witnesses who attorneys disclose must also provide a written report with the disclosure “if the witness is one retained or specially employed to provide expert testimony in the case or one whose duties as the party’s employee regularly involve giving expert testimony.” The Rule requires this expert report to contain certain information, including:

  • A complete statement of all opinions the witness will express and the basis and reasons for them
  • The facts or data considered by the witness in forming them
  • Any exhibits the expert will use to summarize or support opinions and/or facts
  • The witness’s qualifications, including a list of all publications authored in the previous 10 years
  • A list of all other cases in which, during the previous 4 years, the witness testified as an expert at trial or by deposition
  • A statement outlining the compensation the expert will receive for consultations and testimony rendered during the course of the case

The court may determine a written report is not necessary. Nevertheless, the disclosure must include a description of the subject matter on which the expert will testify. The disclosure must also include a summary of the expected facts and opinions the expert will address in their testimony.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure?

Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires parties to disclose certain information to one another, including the identities of witnesses they intend to call at trial, and establishes specific requirements for disclosing expert witnesses and their reports.

What information must be disclosed for expert witnesses under Rule 26?

Expert witnesses must disclose their identity, a written report (if applicable), a complete statement of opinions, the facts or data considered, any exhibits, qualifications, a list of previous cases, and compensation details. If a report is not necessary, a description of the subject matter and a summary of expected facts and opinions are still required.

How do I prepare an expert report according to Rule 26 requirements?

Prepare an expert report according to Rule 26 by including a complete statement of opinions, the facts or data considered, any supporting exhibits, the witness's qualifications, a list of previous expert testimony, and a statement of compensation, as required by Rule 26(a)(2)(B). If a written report is not necessary, provide a description of the subject matter and a summary of expected facts and opinions.

About the author

Dani Alexis Ryskamp, J.D.

Dani Alexis Ryskamp, J.D.

Dani Alexis Ryskamp, J.D., is a multifaceted legal professional with extensive experience in insurance defense, personal injury, and medical malpractice law. Her diverse background includes valuable internships in criminal defense, which have enriched her understanding of various legal sectors. She served as the Executive Note Editor of the Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, demonstrating a strong commitment to legal scholarship. Dani graduated with a J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School in 2007, following a summa cum laude B.A. in English from Ferris State University in 2004. She is an active member of the Michigan State Bar and the American Bar Association, reflecting her dedication to the legal profession.

Currently, Dani has channeled her legal expertise into a successful career as a freelance writer and book critic, primarily focusing on the legal and literary markets. Her writing portfolio encompasses a wide range of topics, including landmark settlements in medical negligence cases, jury awards in personal injury lawsuits, and analyses of legal trial tactics. Her work not only showcases her legal acumen but also her exceptional ability to communicate complex legal issues effectively to a broader audience. Dani's unique blend of legal practice experience and her prowess in legal writing positions her at the intersection of law and literature, allowing her to contribute meaningfully to both fields.

Dani earned her Bachelor of Arts in English from Ferris State University, where she was involved in various activities, including serving as a tutor at the Writing Center, editor in chief of the Muskegon River Review, president of the Dead Poets' Society, secretary of the Public Administration Association, and a member of the varsity synchronized skating team. She obtained her Doctor of Law from the University of Michigan Law School, participating in the Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Wolverine Street Law Moot Court, and the Mock Trial Team. Additionally, Dani holds a Master of Arts in English Language and Literature/Letters from Western Michigan University, where she was a graduate assistant for the Hilltop Review.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.