Oklahoma Expert Witness Disclosure Requirements

Oklahoma requires timely expert witness disclosures to ensure fair trials, emphasizing detailed information and ongoing updates to avoid severe penalties.

ByZach Barreto

Updated on

Oklahoma supreme court

When Are Expert Witness Disclosures Required in Oklahoma?

In Oklahoma, the timing of expert witness disclosures is governed by the Oklahoma Rules of Civil Procedure and specific local court rules. The initial disclosure of expert witnesses is typically required early in the litigation process. According to the Oklahoma Rules of Civil Procedure, parties must disclose the identity of any expert witness they intend to call at trial along with a summary of the expert's opinions as soon as practicable, but no later than 90 days before the trial date. This timeline ensures that both parties have adequate time to prepare for cross-examination and to consider the expert testimony in their case strategy.

Supplemental disclosures are necessary if there are changes to the expert's opinions or if additional information becomes available. These updates must occur promptly, and ideally, no later than 30 days before trial. In certain complex cases, courts may set specific timelines for expert disclosures in scheduling orders, which may deviate from standard timelines and should be closely adhered to by the parties involved.

Information That Must Be Included in the Disclosure

Oklahoma law requires that expert witness disclosures contain comprehensive information to facilitate fair trial proceedings. The following elements must be included:

  • Expert Qualifications: A detailed account of the expert's qualifications, including their education, training, and experience, to establish credibility.
  • Opinions and Bases for Opinions: A thorough summary of the expert's opinions and the factual basis or methodology used to form these opinions.
  • Data Considered: Identification of the data or information considered by the expert in forming their opinion, allowing for effective cross-examination.
  • Fee Structures: Disclosure of the compensation being paid to the expert, which may be relevant to questions of bias.
  • Prior Testimony: A list of cases in which the expert has testified in the past four years, providing insight into their experience and potential biases.

These disclosure requirements are designed to provide transparency and allow opposing parties to effectively challenge or corroborate the expert's testimony.

Supplementing and Amending Expert Disclosures

The duty to supplement or amend expert witness disclosures in Oklahoma is critical to maintaining the integrity of the judicial process. Parties are required to update their disclosures if they learn that the information previously provided is incomplete or incorrect. This duty is ongoing and extends throughout the discovery phase until the trial.

Supplementation is required when:

  • New information arises that affects the expert's opinions or the basis for these opinions.
  • There are changes in the expert's qualifications or compensation.

Failing to appropriately update disclosures can lead to significant consequences. Courts may exclude the expert's testimony if the opposing party is prejudiced by the failure to disclose. Additionally, parties may face sanctions, including fines or adverse inferences, which can impact the outcome of the litigation.

Consequences of Failing to Properly Disclose an Expert

Non-compliance with expert disclosure requirements in Oklahoma can have severe repercussions. The most immediate consequence is the potential exclusion of the expert's testimony. Under Oklahoma law, if a party fails to disclose an expert witness or their opinions adequately, the court may prohibit the expert from testifying at trial.

Further penalties include:

  • Motions to Strike Experts: Opposing parties may file motions to strike the expert's testimony, arguing that the inadequate disclosure has prejudiced their case.
  • Sanctions: Courts have the discretion to impose sanctions on parties who fail to comply with disclosure rules, which may include monetary fines or orders to pay the opposing party's costs.
  • Litigation Risks: Failing to disclose can undermine a party's credibility and weaken their overall litigation strategy, potentially affecting settlement negotiations or trial outcomes.

These consequences underscore the importance of adhering to disclosure requirements to avoid jeopardizing one's case.

State-Specific Rules and Key Considerations

Oklahoma's rules regarding expert witness disclosures align closely with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure but include unique state-specific nuances. Under Title 12 of the Oklahoma Statutes, Section 3226 governs the discovery of expert witness information, outlining the requirements for disclosure and supplementation.

Key considerations include:

  • Local Court Rules: Different judicial districts within Oklahoma may have additional rules or orders affecting the timing and content of expert disclosures.
  • Variations from FRCP: While Oklahoma generally follows the federal model, practitioners should be aware of any departures or specific interpretations by Oklahoma courts.
  • Case Law: Oklahoma courts have addressed expert disclosure issues in various cases, such as State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Dobbs, emphasizing the importance of full and timely disclosure to ensure procedural fairness.

In conclusion, understanding and complying with Oklahoma's expert witness disclosure rules is essential for legal practitioners. By adhering to these requirements, parties can ensure a fair trial process and avoid the significant consequences of non-compliance.

About the author

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto is a distinguished professional in the legal industry, currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Research at the Expert Institute. With a deep understanding of a broad range of legal practice areas, Zach's expertise encompasses personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, defective products, and many other sectors. His skills are particularly evident in handling complex litigation matters, including high-profile cases like the Opioids litigation, NFL Concussion Litigation, California Wildfires, 3M earplugs, Elmiron, Transvaginal Mesh, NFL Concussion Litigation, Roundup, Camp Lejeune, Hernia Mesh, IVC filters, Paraquat, Paragard, Talcum Powder, Zantac, and many others.

Under his leadership, the Expert Institute’s research team has expanded impressively from a single member to a robust team of 100 professionals over the last decade. This growth reflects his ability to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of legal research and expert recruitment effectively. Zach has been instrumental in working on nationally significant litigation matters, including cases involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toxic chemical exposure, and wrongful death, among others.

At the Expert Institute, Zach is responsible for managing all aspects of the research department and developing strategic institutional relationships. He plays a key role in equipping attorneys for success through expert consulting, case management, strategic research, and expert due diligence provided by the Institute’s cloud-based legal services platform, Expert iQ.

Educationally, Zach holds a Bachelor's degree in Political Science and European History from Vanderbilt University.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.