NY State Sues Amazon Over Alleged Failures to Protect Workers From COVID-19

New York sues Amazon, alleging failures to protect warehouse workers from COVID-19 and retaliation against those who spoke out, raising questions about workplace safety.

NY State Sues Amazon Over Alleged Failures to Protect Workers From COVID-19

On February 16, 2021, New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit against Amazon, alleging it failed to protect workers at two warehouses from the COVID-19 pandemic. The complaint further asserts that Amazon took retaliatory action against employees who spoke out against warehouse conditions.

Allegations Against Amazon

The complaint, filed in a New York state court in Manhattan, names Amazon.com Inc., Amazon.com Sales, Inc., and Amazon.com Services Inc. as defendants. In the complaint, New York alleges that Amazon “has repeatedly and persistently failed to comply with its obligation to institute reasonable and adequate measures to protect its workers from the spread of the virus” in two New York City facilities: JFK8, a Staten Island fulfillment center, and DBK1, a distribution center in Queens.

The complaint alleges that Amazon failed to meet workplace health and safety requirements set forth in New York labor laws for the protection of workers in its warehouses, including cleaning and disinfection, contact tracing, and allowing employees to take the time they needed to wash their hands, clean work areas, engaging in social distancing, and take similar steps.

In addition, the complaint claims that when Amazon workers raised objections and complaints about the company’s actions, “Amazon took swift retaliatory action to silence workers’ complaints” in violation of state whistleblower laws. For instance, Amazon allegedly fired Christian Smalls, a worker who led a protest over conditions at the Staten Island warehouse.

The complaint also alleges that Amazon has continued in its various failures to protect workers since at least March 2020. These include deficient attempts at contact tracing and poor cleaning, as well as continuing to hold workers to stringent productivity requirements that interfered with workers’ ability to clean, practice appropriate personal hygiene, or socially distance.

Previous Cases Against Amazon

The COVID-19-related case brought by the state of New York is far from the first against Amazon. The company was previously involved in a lawsuit in 2020 brought by employee Derrick Palmer and two other workers, who alleged the company retaliated against them after they sought better safety protections at the Staten Island warehouse during the pandemic. That lawsuit was later dismissed.

Another case—a federal class action—was filed on behalf of several Black and Latinx Amazon employees over the company’s alleged failures to provide PPE and allow for proper sanitization. The lead plaintiff claims that after he organized protests against these conditions at a New Jersey warehouse, his employment was terminated.

The New York Attorney General’s echoes many of the concerns raised in these previous cases, including claims about lack of personal protective equipment, sanitization, poor contact tracing, the inability of workers to adequately social distance or have time to clean their own workspaces, and claims of retaliatory action taken against workers who spoke up. Amazon now faces these claims in both state and federal courts, in various forms.

What to Expect In This Case

The early months of the COVID-19 pandemic came with a host of uncertainties and little, if any, federal guidance. The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), for example, chose to provide only optional guidance to workplaces for many months, rather than setting a clear standard for compliance when it came to the pandemic and worker safety. Lack of contact tracing in the early stages of the pandemic poses another hurdle. With little or no data on how the virus spread from person to person, it can be difficult to establish whether workers who contracted COVID-19 did so from co-workers or from another source.

As a result, determining whether, how, and to what extent a company is liable for worker illness or death from COVID-19 remains a complex question. Expert witnesses will likely play a key role in many of these cases. For example, epidemiologists and virologists may be asked to weigh in on the ways COVID-19 spreads, particularly in the workplace. Experts who focus on workplace health and safety, ventilation, sanitation, and similar OSHA-related questions may also be asked to opine on how a particular workplace’s setup and standards may or may not have contributed to workers becoming ill with the virus.

As these cases work their way through the courts, the details of workplace safety during the pandemic and identifying liable parties will become clearer with the help of a variety of expert witnesses.

About the author

Dani Alexis Ryskamp, J.D.

Dani Alexis Ryskamp, J.D.

Dani Alexis Ryskamp, J.D., is a multifaceted legal professional with extensive experience in insurance defense, personal injury, and medical malpractice law. Her diverse background includes valuable internships in criminal defense, which have enriched her understanding of various legal sectors. She served as the Executive Note Editor of the Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, demonstrating a strong commitment to legal scholarship. Dani graduated with a J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School in 2007, following a summa cum laude B.A. in English from Ferris State University in 2004. She is an active member of the Michigan State Bar and the American Bar Association, reflecting her dedication to the legal profession.

Currently, Dani has channeled her legal expertise into a successful career as a freelance writer and book critic, primarily focusing on the legal and literary markets. Her writing portfolio encompasses a wide range of topics, including landmark settlements in medical negligence cases, jury awards in personal injury lawsuits, and analyses of legal trial tactics. Her work not only showcases her legal acumen but also her exceptional ability to communicate complex legal issues effectively to a broader audience. Dani's unique blend of legal practice experience and her prowess in legal writing positions her at the intersection of law and literature, allowing her to contribute meaningfully to both fields.

Dani earned her Bachelor of Arts in English from Ferris State University, where she was involved in various activities, including serving as a tutor at the Writing Center, editor in chief of the Muskegon River Review, president of the Dead Poets' Society, secretary of the Public Administration Association, and a member of the varsity synchronized skating team. She obtained her Doctor of Law from the University of Michigan Law School, participating in the Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Wolverine Street Law Moot Court, and the Mock Trial Team. Additionally, Dani holds a Master of Arts in English Language and Literature/Letters from Western Michigan University, where she was a graduate assistant for the Hilltop Review.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.