The Biggest Personal Injury Verdicts & Settlements of 2026

Massive personal injury verdicts and settlements in 2026 highlight corporate liability, from workplace accidents to consumer injuries, with major settlements still facing appeals.

ByZach Barreto

Updated on

Attorney working at desk with gavel

Maryland: $71M Verdict Against Apartment Owner After Fire Forces Teen to Jump, Causing Paralysis

Represented by: Gilman & Bedigian

A Prince George’s County jury awarded more than $71 million to Godlove Djapa, who suffered catastrophic injuries after jumping from a second-story apartment during a nighttime fire at the Lilly Garden apartment complex in Lanham. The May 2022 fire occurred without functioning sprinklers or an audible fire alarm, leaving Djapa, then 18, and his family trapped as flames spread through their unit. With their apartment door jammed from heat expansion, Djapa and his brother were forced to jump from a window approximately 15 to 20 feet above the ground.

Djapa sustained spinal fractures, broken ribs, and a concussion, resulting in permanent brain damage and paralysis from the chest down. He later sued Riverdale Towne Apartments, the property owner, alleging unsafe conditions and inadequate fire protection. After deliberating for roughly 30 minutes, the jury awarded $71.39 million, including damages for lost earning capacity, noneconomic harm, and extensive future medical care. The verdict—believed by plaintiff’s counsel to be the largest personal injury award in Prince George’s County history—reflects the lifelong care Djapa will require following the incident.

New York: $8M Verdict Against City of Yonkers in Municipal Truck Collision

Represented by: Napoli Shkolnik PLLC

A Westchester County jury awarded $8 million against the City of Yonkers following a collision between a municipal truck and a driver who was parked on Ashburton Avenue. The plaintiff alleged that a city-owned vehicle turned onto the roadway and struck his car, causing injuries that significantly affected his daily functioning and ability to participate in community activities. The case proceeded as a negligence action against the city, with the plaintiff asserting that the crash was preventable and caused by a city employee acting within the scope of employment.

At trial, the plaintiff described injuries to his neck, left shoulder, lower back, and left knee, emphasizing lasting pain, physical limitations, and the need for ongoing treatment. The jury awarded $2 million for past pain and suffering, $4.5 million for future pain and suffering, and $1.5 million for future medical expenses. The verdict, which far exceeded the city’s $35,000 pretrial offer, highlights the potential exposure municipalities face when jurors credit claims of long-term impairment and future care needs arising from vehicle operations.

Conclusion

These 2026 personal injury settlements and verdicts underscore the significant financial and legal consequences companies face when safety measures fail. From workplace hazards to consumer injuries, courts continue to hold corporations accountable for negligence that results in harm. The substantial awards reflect the long-term impact of these incidents on victims' lives, reinforcing the importance of corporate responsibility and risk management. As appeals and insurance disputes unfold, these cases highlight the ongoing complexities of personal injury litigation and the evolving landscape of liability in industries ranging from hospitality to construction.

For insight into last year's most significant personal injury cases, see our Top Personal Injury Payouts of 2025.

About the author

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto is a distinguished professional in the legal industry, currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Research at the Expert Institute. With a deep understanding of a broad range of legal practice areas, Zach's expertise encompasses personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, and defective products. His skills are particularly evident in handling complex litigation matters, including high-profile cases such as opioids litigation, NFL concussion litigation, California wildfires, 3M earplugs, Elmiron, transvaginal mesh, Roundup, Camp Lejeune, hernia mesh, IVC filters, Paraquat, Paragard, talcum powder, and Zantac.

Under his leadership, the Expert Institute’s research team has expanded impressively from a single member to a robust team of 100 professionals over the last decade. This growth reflects his ability to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of legal research and expert recruitment effectively. Zach has been instrumental in working on nationally significant litigation matters, including cases involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toxic chemical exposure, and wrongful death, among others.

At the Expert Institute, Zach is responsible for managing all aspects of the research department and developing strategic institutional relationships. He plays a key role in equipping attorneys for success through expert consulting, case management, strategic research, and expert due diligence provided by the Institute’s cloud-based legal services platform, Expert iQ. Zach holds a Bachelor's Degree in Political Science and European History from Vanderbilt University.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.