Why Finding an Expert Shouldn’t Take Up Your Entire Week
Streamline expert witness searches with a tailored, time-saving approach that reduces risk, boosts strategy, and keeps litigation timelines on track.
Updated on
Locating the right expert witness is often a painstaking and time-consuming endeavor. Attorneys routinely spend hours reviewing CVs, conducting background checks, making outreach calls, and filtering through irrelevant candidates. While due diligence is necessary, this exhaustive process can quickly consume the very time that legal teams need to focus on strategy, drafting, and client preparation. In time-sensitive litigation, this inefficiency can become a liability.
The Traditional Search: Time-Intensive and Disjointed
Despite a wide range of tools available—from professional directories to peer recommendations—the search for an expert remains fragmented. Static databases rarely offer the full context needed to assess an expert’s suitability for a specific matter. Credentials alone do not reflect whether an expert has relevant testimonial experience, has survived admissibility challenges, or has any conflicts of interest.
Common issues with the traditional search process include:
- Outdated or incomplete information in online directories
- Overreliance on personal referrals that yield unsuitable or unavailable candidates
- Time-intensive vetting of litigation history, conflicts, and methodology
- Lack of insight into admissibility standards or prior testimony quality
For many firms—especially those with limited staff—this process can disrupt workflows and reduce the time attorneys spend on litigation strategy or client service.
Time Lost Is Opportunity Lost
The cost of a protracted expert search extends beyond billable hours. Delays in securing an expert may compress the timeline for drafting reports, conducting depositions, or meeting disclosure deadlines. The ripple effect can result in rushed work product, increased likelihood of procedural errors, or difficulty responding to opposing expert opinions.
Key risks include:
- Missed or delayed disclosure deadlines
- Reduced time for expert integration into litigation strategy
- Increased pressure on attorneys to vet and onboard experts without adequate support
- Limited opportunity for expert input during early case development
In short, when attorneys are bogged down with administrative work, the case itself can suffer.
A More Efficient Approach
Expert Institute’s Expert Witness Search service is designed to eliminate the inefficiencies of the traditional process. Rather than placing the burden of research on the attorney, the service allows legal teams to submit a tailored request based on the precise needs of the case—specialty area, litigation phase, jurisdiction, and other relevant criteria.
From there, our in-house research team actively sources and screens expert candidates. Each expert is vetted for their qualifications, availability, litigation history, and relevance to the matter at hand. The attorney is presented with a shortlist of curated, high-quality candidates, each ready to engage and offer support.
This proactive, tailored approach saves valuable time and mitigates the risks associated with hurried selections or ill-suited matches. In most cases, attorneys receive expert options within days, allowing them to move forward with confidence and speed.
Time Savings That Translate to Strategic Gains
By offloading the legwork involved in the expert search, attorneys regain critical hours that can be redirected toward higher-value tasks. Case strategy, motion drafting, and client advisement benefit when attorneys are not entrenched in administrative delays.
Moreover, early access to a qualified expert allows for deeper integration into case development. Experts who are brought on sooner can help shape interrogatories, identify gaps in opposing counsel’s approach, and strengthen key arguments well ahead of trial. This early involvement can be a decisive advantage in litigation that hinges on technical or scientific issues.
Making the Most of Limited Time
Litigation timelines are rigid, and the demands on legal professionals only grow as cases progress. Delaying expert engagement—or allocating hours toward a search that yields poor results—can place undue strain on a legal team and introduce avoidable risk. The ability to act quickly and decisively often comes down to how efficiently key components of the case are handled.
Expert Institute’s Expert Witness Search offers a way to meet those demands without compromising on quality or thoroughness. By leveraging tailored research and a vetted network of professionals, the service transforms a traditionally slow process into a streamlined, results-oriented solution.
About the author
Zach Barreto
Zach Barreto is a distinguished professional in the legal industry, currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Research at the Expert Institute. With a deep understanding of a broad range of legal practice areas, Zach's expertise encompasses personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, defective products, and many other sectors. His skills are particularly evident in handling complex litigation matters, including high-profile cases like the Opioids litigation, NFL Concussion Litigation, California Wildfires, 3M earplugs, Elmiron, Transvaginal Mesh, NFL Concussion Litigation, Roundup, Camp Lejeune, Hernia Mesh, IVC filters, Paraquat, Paragard, Talcum Powder, Zantac, and many others.
Under his leadership, the Expert Institute’s research team has expanded impressively from a single member to a robust team of 100 professionals over the last decade. This growth reflects his ability to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of legal research and expert recruitment effectively. Zach has been instrumental in working on nationally significant litigation matters, including cases involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toxic chemical exposure, and wrongful death, among others.
At the Expert Institute, Zach is responsible for managing all aspects of the research department and developing strategic institutional relationships. He plays a key role in equipping attorneys for success through expert consulting, case management, strategic research, and expert due diligence provided by the Institute’s cloud-based legal services platform, Expert iQ.
Educationally, Zach holds a Bachelor's degree in Political Science and European History from Vanderbilt University.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.
Sign up nowA Sample Voir Dire: How To Qualify An Expert Witness
Download free white paperChallenging Opposing Experts: Advanced Research Techniques
Download free white paperCross Examining Expert Witnesses: The Ultimate Guide
Download free white paper
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.