Expert Witnesses as Part of a Modern LPO Strategy

LPO evolves into a strategic tool by integrating expert witnesses early, enhancing litigation insight, efficiency, and preparedness without revealing key details.

ByZach Barreto

Updated on

Attorney on computer

Legal Process Outsourcing (LPO) has evolved from a cost-saving mechanism into a strategic pillar for litigation management. As law firms and corporate legal departments navigate increasingly complex caseloads, they are turning to more dynamic LPO approaches that prioritize not just document review or research but also the early integration of expert witnesses. This shift offers a multidimensional advantage: more informed case assessments, reduced litigation costs, and better-prepared trial strategies.

The Challenges of Traditional Expert Witness Engagement

Traditionally, expert witnesses are brought in during the later stages of litigation. By then, discovery is often complete, pleadings are fixed, and critical strategic decisions have already been made. This timeline limits the expert’s impact. As a result, attorneys may invest heavily in early-stage litigation without the benefit of expert insights that could inform whether a case should even proceed to trial.

Moreover, late-stage engagement increases the likelihood of duplicative work. Experts may need to reassess documents, reframe conclusions, or repeat analyses already conducted by in-house teams. This inefficiency drives up costs and creates misalignment between legal teams and technical specialists.

As litigation budgets face increasing scrutiny, especially in large-scale or multidistrict proceedings, this reactive model no longer serves the interests of clients or law firms.

Integrating Expert Witnesses into the LPO Framework

Legal teams are increasingly embedding expert witnesses within their LPO strategy at the outset of litigation. This shift reflects a broader move toward proactive litigation planning—using outsourced resources not just for volume-based tasks, but for high-impact decision-making.

LPO providers now often maintain networks of qualified experts across disciplines: engineering, medicine, finance, cybersecurity, and more. By tapping into these networks early, attorneys gain technical insights that inform every stage of litigation, including:

  • Early case assessment – Determining case merit and scope with technical accuracy.
  • Discovery planning – Identifying relevant data types and sources with expert precision.
  • Deposition preparation – Tailoring questions to key technical issues likely to arise.
  • Settlement evaluation – Leveraging expert insights to establish realistic damages estimates.

Benefits to Cost, Efficiency, and Strategy

  1. Streamlined Case Evaluation: One of the greatest benefits of early expert engagement through LPO is faster, more accurate case triage. Attorneys can assess potential claims with a firmer understanding of liability and causation, avoiding unnecessary litigation and strengthening cases that merit investment. This is particularly valuable in mass tort and product liability litigation, where early-stage medical or scientific analysis can significantly narrow the field.
  2. Reduced Duplication and Delays: By integrating expert review into the front end of document analysis, LPO teams can avoid repeated rounds of evaluation. Documents are reviewed once, through both legal and technical lenses. The result is a leaner process that reduces turnaround times and supports synchronized workstreams between attorneys and expert consultants.
  3. Enhanced Trial Readiness: When expert witnesses are embedded in the litigation process from the beginning, their opinions are better aligned with case theory. They become strategic partners, not just isolated voices presenting findings. This integration enhances consistency across pleadings, depositions, and trial testimony.
  4. Predictable Cost Structures: Outsourcing expert integration through an LPO provider can also create more predictable cost models. Instead of ad hoc engagements with individual experts, legal teams can negotiate fixed or phased pricing through the LPO vendor. This can significantly ease budget planning and client reporting obligations.

A Scalable Model for Complex Litigation

The value of this integrated approach becomes especially clear in large-scale litigation, such as antitrust, intellectual property, and mass torts. In these cases, the scope of discovery, the volume of data, and the technical complexity require seamless collaboration between legal and expert teams.

By treating expert witnesses as a foundational component of the LPO strategy, legal teams can deploy a repeatable and scalable model across multiple jurisdictions and cases. Experts become familiar with the litigation framework early, enabling faster onboarding and more consistent outcomes across related matters.

Leveraging Expert Institute’s Tools

Expert Institute offers tools that align seamlessly with a modern LPO strategy—most notably, Expert Search and Expert Radar. These solutions are designed to streamline the process of locating, vetting, and engaging top-tier expert witnesses, addressing a critical challenge in litigation support.

Expert Search is a custom-matching service that connects legal teams with highly qualified experts across thousands of disciplines. Rather than relying on static databases or directories, Expert Search delivers hand-selected candidates based on the technical demands of a case, jurisdictional needs, and testimony experience. This approach saves valuable time and ensures that law firms aren’t left settling for generalists in cases that demand specialized insight.

Expert Radar, on the other hand, equips legal professionals with deep, real-time intelligence on expert witnesses already involved in litigation. This includes performance history, admissibility challenges, prior case outcomes, and more. The platform provides a strategic edge during cross-examination preparation, Daubert challenges, and when assessing the credibility of opposing experts. According to internal case studies, the use of Expert Radar has helped firms uncover critical impeachment material that would otherwise go unnoticed.

Both tools complement a modern LPO strategy by:

  • Accelerating expert engagement – reducing the time to locate, vet, and onboard the right professional
  • Supporting informed decisions – offering detailed analytics to assess expert reliability and strategic fit
  • Enhancing litigation preparedness – providing litigation histories and expert-specific intelligence to avoid surprises in court

As the litigation landscape grows more complex, legal teams must rethink when and how they engage expert witnesses. By embedding expert insight into the earliest stages of litigation through a modern LPO framework, firms can unlock greater efficiency, precision, and competitive edge. The future of legal strategy isn’t just outsourced—it’s intelligently integrated.

About the author

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto is a distinguished professional in the legal industry, currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Research at the Expert Institute. With a deep understanding of a broad range of legal practice areas, Zach's expertise encompasses personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, defective products, and many other sectors. His skills are particularly evident in handling complex litigation matters, including high-profile cases like the Opioids litigation, NFL Concussion Litigation, California Wildfires, 3M earplugs, Elmiron, Transvaginal Mesh, NFL Concussion Litigation, Roundup, Camp Lejeune, Hernia Mesh, IVC filters, Paraquat, Paragard, Talcum Powder, Zantac, and many others.

Under his leadership, the Expert Institute’s research team has expanded impressively from a single member to a robust team of 100 professionals over the last decade. This growth reflects his ability to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of legal research and expert recruitment effectively. Zach has been instrumental in working on nationally significant litigation matters, including cases involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toxic chemical exposure, and wrongful death, among others.

At the Expert Institute, Zach is responsible for managing all aspects of the research department and developing strategic institutional relationships. He plays a key role in equipping attorneys for success through expert consulting, case management, strategic research, and expert due diligence provided by the Institute’s cloud-based legal services platform, Expert iQ.

Educationally, Zach holds a Bachelor's degree in Political Science and European History from Vanderbilt University.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.