Tennessee Expert Witness Report Rules

Expert witness reports in Tennessee aren't always required, but parties must disclose expert identities and opinions, adhering to specific rules and timelines.

ByZach Barreto

Updated on

Tennessee capitol

In this article

Are Expert Witness Reports Required in Tennessee?

In Tennessee, expert witness reports are not universally mandated by state law. However, Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure require parties to disclose expert witnesses and their intended testimony. According to Tenn. R. Civ. P. 26.02(4), a party may request through interrogatories the identification of each expert expected to testify at trial, along with the substance of the facts and opinions the expert will provide. This disclosure typically involves either a detailed summary or an expert report.

The timing for these disclosures is often dictated by court scheduling orders, which means expert reports or summaries must be disclosed at specified times during the discovery phase, well before trial. This ensures that both parties have adequate time to prepare for the expert testimony. The specific deadlines for disclosure are governed by the court's discretion and are typically outlined in scheduling orders issued for each case.

What is Required in a Tennessee Expert Witness Report?

Although Tennessee does not require a formal expert report in every case, when such a report is provided or required, it should comprehensively detail the expert's opinions, the bases for these opinions, the data considered, and any exhibits that support the testimony. Additionally, the expert’s qualifications, including their educational and professional background, as well as the details of any compensation for their testimony, should be included.

Unlike federal requirements, Tennessee does not have a standardized format for expert witness reports, which allows some flexibility. However, the essential components—opinions, supporting data, and qualifications—must be clearly conveyed to comply with disclosure obligations under Tenn. R. Civ. P. 26.02(4).

Scope and Authorship of the Report

In Tennessee, expert reports may be drafted by the expert themselves or with the assistance of counsel. However, the opinions and conclusions expressed must be those of the expert witness. Attorney involvement is typically limited to ensuring that the report is comprehensive and compliant with procedural requirements. The extent of permissible attorney involvement can vary based on the type of case and the complexity of the expert's testimony.

The scope of an expert's report might differ depending on the nature of the case—be it medical malpractice, complex commercial litigation, or another area where expert testimony is pivotal.

Missing, Deficient, and Untimely Reports

Failure to provide an expert report or summary, or providing one that is incomplete or untimely, can have significant repercussions under Tennessee law. Tenn. R. Civ. P. 37.03 allows courts to exclude expert testimony if a party fails to disclose an expert witness or their opinions in accordance with the rules. This exclusion can occur unless the failure to disclose is deemed harmless. Courts may also impose other sanctions or grant continuances to mitigate any prejudice caused by such deficiencies.

  • Consequences of Non-Compliance:
  • Exclusion of expert testimony
  • Imposition of sanctions
  • Potential continuances to address prejudice

Original, Supplemental, and Rebuttal Reports

In Tennessee, the distinctions between original, supplemental, and rebuttal expert reports are significant. The original report or disclosure is the primary statement of the expert's opinions. Supplemental reports are necessary when there are changes to the expert's initial opinions or the data supporting those opinions. Under Tenn. R. Civ. P. 26.05, there is a duty to supplement discovery responses, which includes updating expert witness information as necessary.

Rebuttal reports, while not explicitly defined by Tennessee procedural rules, can be used to address and counter opinions presented by opposing experts. The timing and appropriateness of supplemental or rebuttal reports often depend on the court's scheduling orders and the specific circumstances of the case.

Relevant State Rules and Legal Requirements

The primary procedural rules governing expert witness disclosures in Tennessee include Tenn. R. Civ. P. 26.02(4) and 26.05. These rules set forth the requirements for expert disclosure, including the duty to supplement information. Tenn. R. Civ. P. 37.03 addresses the potential consequences for failing to comply with these disclosure obligations.

Key case law interpreting these rules often emphasizes the importance of timely and complete expert disclosures to ensure fairness in the judicial process. Tennessee’s approach may differ from the federal practice, particularly in the flexibility allowed for report formats and the reliance on court-specific scheduling orders to dictate disclosure timelines.

This framework ensures that expert testimony is presented in a manner that promotes transparency and fairness, reflecting both the procedural requirements and the unique legal landscape of Tennessee.

About the author

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto is a distinguished professional in the legal industry, currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Research at the Expert Institute. With a deep understanding of a broad range of legal practice areas, Zach's expertise encompasses personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, and defective products. His skills are particularly evident in handling complex litigation matters, including high-profile cases such as opioids litigation, NFL concussion litigation, California wildfires, 3M earplugs, Elmiron, transvaginal mesh, Roundup, Camp Lejeune, hernia mesh, IVC filters, Paraquat, Paragard, talcum powder, and Zantac.

Under his leadership, the Expert Institute’s research team has expanded impressively from a single member to a robust team of 100 professionals over the last decade. This growth reflects his ability to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of legal research and expert recruitment effectively. Zach has been instrumental in working on nationally significant litigation matters, including cases involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toxic chemical exposure, and wrongful death, among others.

At the Expert Institute, Zach is responsible for managing all aspects of the research department and developing strategic institutional relationships. He plays a key role in equipping attorneys for success through expert consulting, case management, strategic research, and expert due diligence provided by the Institute’s cloud-based legal services platform, Expert iQ. Zach holds a Bachelor's Degree in Political Science and European History from Vanderbilt University.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.