Maine Expert Witness Report Rules

Expert witness reports in Maine aren't always mandatory but are commonly provided during discovery, with specific rules governing their disclosure and timing.

ByZach Barreto

Updated on

Maine capitol

In this article

Are Expert Witness Reports Required in Maine?

In Maine, expert witness reports are not universally mandated by state law or court rules. However, under the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically Me. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4), parties can be compelled through interrogatories to disclose any expert witnesses expected to testify at trial, along with the subject matter and substance of their opinions. If an expert has prepared a report, it is common practice in Maine to provide this report as part of the discovery process.

The timing for the disclosure of expert witness reports often depends on a court-issued scheduling order. These orders typically set deadlines for the plaintiff to designate experts and provide their reports, which are generally required before trial and during the discovery phase. Failure to comply with these timelines may result in the exclusion of the expert's testimony at trial.

What is Required in a Maine Expert Witness Report?

An expert witness report in Maine should include:

  • Opinions: Clearly stated opinions the expert intends to testify about.
  • Bases for Opinions: A summary of the facts or data the expert considered in forming their opinions.
  • Exhibits: Any exhibits that will be used to support the expert's testimony.
  • Qualifications: A statement of the expert’s qualifications, including publications authored, and a list of cases in which the expert has testified.
  • Compensation: Information on the compensation to be paid for the study and testimony.

While Maine aligns closely with the federal model, it may have unique disclosure requirements depending on the case type or court order.

Scope and Authorship of the Report

In Maine, the expert typically drafts and signs their own report. However, attorneys may assist in organizing or formatting the report, provided the substantive content reflects the expert's independent opinions. The scope of the report can vary significantly based on the type of expert testimony and the specific case at hand.

Missing, Deficient, and Untimely Reports

Failing to provide a complete and timely expert witness report can have serious consequences in Maine. According to Me. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4), an expert not properly disclosed or whose report is deficient may be barred from testifying at trial. Other potential consequences include:

  • Exclusion of Testimony: The expert's testimony may be excluded to ensure fairness.
  • Sanctions: The court may impose sanctions on the non-compliant party.
  • Continuances: The trial may be delayed to allow for proper disclosure.

Original, Supplemental, and Rebuttal Reports

Maine rules do not explicitly use federal terminology such as "supplemental" or "rebuttal" reports. However, Me. R. Civ. P. 26(e) requires parties to seasonably supplement their disclosures, which may encompass updates or corrections to previously submitted expert reports. The timing and necessity of these supplemental disclosures are often governed by court orders or local rules.

Relevant State Rules and Legal Requirements

The primary rule governing expert disclosures in Maine is Me. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4). This rule closely mirrors the federal standard, allowing for the discovery of expert information through interrogatories and other means. However, Maine courts may interpret these rules differently, and local practices can influence the application of these requirements. Notable differences from federal practice include the potential need for court leave to depose experts after their disclosure.

Key considerations include:

  • Interrogatories: Used to identify expert witnesses and obtain report details.
  • Depositions: Permitted with court approval after initial disclosures.
  • Court Orders: Deadlines for expert disclosures are often set by court order, impacting the timing and scope of the required reports.

About the author

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto is a distinguished professional in the legal industry, currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Research at the Expert Institute. With a deep understanding of a broad range of legal practice areas, Zach's expertise encompasses personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, and defective products. His skills are particularly evident in handling complex litigation matters, including high-profile cases such as opioids litigation, NFL concussion litigation, California wildfires, 3M earplugs, Elmiron, transvaginal mesh, Roundup, Camp Lejeune, hernia mesh, IVC filters, Paraquat, Paragard, talcum powder, and Zantac.

Under his leadership, the Expert Institute’s research team has expanded impressively from a single member to a robust team of 100 professionals over the last decade. This growth reflects his ability to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of legal research and expert recruitment effectively. Zach has been instrumental in working on nationally significant litigation matters, including cases involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toxic chemical exposure, and wrongful death, among others.

At the Expert Institute, Zach is responsible for managing all aspects of the research department and developing strategic institutional relationships. He plays a key role in equipping attorneys for success through expert consulting, case management, strategic research, and expert due diligence provided by the Institute’s cloud-based legal services platform, Expert iQ. Zach holds a Bachelor's Degree in Political Science and European History from Vanderbilt University.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.