Oklahoma Expert Witness Discovery Rules

Oklahoma's expert discovery rules outline disclosure, limits on communications, and consequences for noncompliance, ensuring a structured legal process.

ByZach Barreto

Updated on

Oklahoma capitol

In this article

What Is the Scope of Expert Discovery in Oklahoma?

In Oklahoma, the discovery of expert information is guided by 12 Okla. Stat. § 3226, which largely parallels the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4). This statute permits parties to require disclosure of expert witnesses expected to testify, including the subject matter of their testimony and the underlying facts and opinions. Specifically, through interrogatories, a party can obtain the substance of the facts and opinions to which each expert is expected to testify and a summary of the grounds for each opinion (§ 3226(B)(3)(a)). However, Oklahoma imposes limits on the discovery of expert communications and draft reports, aligning with protections similar to federal standards (§ 3226(B)(3)(c)).

Timing and Procedure for Expert Discovery in Oklahoma

Expert discovery in Oklahoma typically occurs after initial disclosures and is often governed by court-issued scheduling orders. These orders set deadlines for the exchange of expert witness lists and expert witness reports, typically requiring the plaintiff’s expert reports to be submitted 90 days before trial and the defendant’s 60 days before (§ 3226(B)(3)(b)). The procedural steps include serving interrogatories and requesting production of expert reports, which must include comprehensive details such as the expert’s opinions, data considered, and compensation. Experts may be deposed once disclosures are made, ensuring thorough preparation for trial.

What Methods of Expert Discovery Are Permitted in Oklahoma?

In Oklahoma, methods of expert discovery include:

  • Interrogatories: As per 12 Okla. Stat. § 3226(B)(3)(a), parties may use interrogatories to disclose expert witnesses and their anticipated testimony.
  • Depositions: Permitted after expert disclosures, allowing parties to probe the details of an expert’s opinions and methodology.
  • Document Requests: Parties can request expert reports and supporting documents, although certain protections apply to draft reports and communications.

Discovery typically focuses on testifying experts, while consulting experts' materials are generally protected unless exceptional circumstances justify disclosure.

Limits on Discovery of Expert Materials and Communications

Oklahoma places specific limits on the discovery of expert materials. Draft reports and most attorney-expert communications are protected under § 3226(B)(3)(c). Exceptions to this protection include communications regarding the expert’s compensation, facts provided by the attorney, or assumptions counsel asked the expert to make. This framework ensures that the focus remains on substantive expert testimony while maintaining essential confidentiality.

Consequences for Noncompliance or Discovery Violations

Failure to comply with expert discovery rules in Oklahoma can lead to significant consequences under 12 Okla. Stat. § 3237. Potential sanctions include:

  • Exclusion of Expert Testimony: Non-disclosure of an expert or failure to provide required information can result in the exclusion of that expert’s testimony.
  • Monetary Sanctions: Courts may impose fines or order payment of the opposing party’s expenses caused by the failure.
  • Continuances: Delays in trial proceedings may be granted to remedy prejudicial discovery violations.

Relevant Rules and Legal Authority in Oklahoma

Key legal authorities governing expert discovery in Oklahoma include:

  • [12 Okla. Stat. § 3226](https://law.justia.com/codes/oklahoma/title-12/section-12-3226/): Governs the disclosure of expert witness information, protection of drafts, and communications.
  • 12 Okla. Stat. § 3237: Addresses sanctions for discovery violations.

These rules highlight Oklahoma’s alignment with federal practices while maintaining unique state-specific procedures that legal professionals must navigate with precision and adherence to court orders.

About the author

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto is a distinguished professional in the legal industry, currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Research at the Expert Institute. With a deep understanding of a broad range of legal practice areas, Zach's expertise encompasses personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, and defective products. His skills are particularly evident in handling complex litigation matters, including high-profile cases such as opioids litigation, NFL concussion litigation, California wildfires, 3M earplugs, Elmiron, transvaginal mesh, Roundup, Camp Lejeune, hernia mesh, IVC filters, Paraquat, Paragard, talcum powder, and Zantac.

Under his leadership, the Expert Institute’s research team has expanded impressively from a single member to a robust team of 100 professionals over the last decade. This growth reflects his ability to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of legal research and expert recruitment effectively. Zach has been instrumental in working on nationally significant litigation matters, including cases involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toxic chemical exposure, and wrongful death, among others.

At the Expert Institute, Zach is responsible for managing all aspects of the research department and developing strategic institutional relationships. He plays a key role in equipping attorneys for success through expert consulting, case management, strategic research, and expert due diligence provided by the Institute’s cloud-based legal services platform, Expert iQ. Zach holds a Bachelor's Degree in Political Science and European History from Vanderbilt University.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.