Kentucky Expert Witness Discovery Rules

Kentucky's expert discovery process focuses on court-driven procedures, emphasizing the distinction between testifying and consulting experts, with strict compliance rules.

ByZach Barreto

Updated on

Kentucky capitol

In this article

What Is the Scope of Expert Discovery in Kentucky?

In Kentucky, the scope of expert discovery is primarily governed by the Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure). Unlike the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4), Kentucky lacks an automatic disclosure system for expert witnesses. Instead, the process is driven largely by court orders and specific requests by the parties. Under Kentucky Rule of Civil Procedure 26.02(4), parties are permitted to discover information regarding testifying expert witnesses. This rule allows for the deposition of such experts once identified, and further discovery, such as the production of reports, can be ordered by the court. However, consulting experts who are not intended to testify at trial are generally protected from discovery unless exceptional circumstances exist.

The limitations on discovery in Kentucky also extend to certain expert materials. Communications between attorneys and expert witnesses, draft reports, and materials prepared by consulting experts are generally shielded from discovery. The discovery process primarily focuses on the experts' final opinions and the bases for those opinions, as required by the court's scheduling order or in response to interrogatories under CR 33.

Timing and Procedure for Expert Discovery in Kentucky

In Kentucky, the timeline for expert discovery is typically set by the trial court through a scheduling order, often under CR 16. This order dictates when parties must disclose their expert witnesses and produce any required reports. Generally, expert discovery occurs after the initial disclosures and before the trial, as specified by the court.

Procedural steps for disclosing expert information include:

  • Answering Interrogatories: Under CR 33, parties may disclose expert witnesses by providing each expert’s name, area of expertise, and a summary of their opinions.
  • Court-Ordered Reports: For retained experts, courts often require the production of written reports summarizing their opinions and the basis for those opinions by the disclosure deadline.
  • Depositions: Depositions of expert witnesses are permitted after they have been identified, as stipulated by Ky. R. Civ. P. 26.02(4).

Parties must also adhere to the duty to supplement discovery responses under CR 26.05 if an expert’s opinion changes or new information is obtained.

What Methods of Expert Discovery Are Permitted in Kentucky?

The methods of expert discovery sanctioned in Kentucky include:

  • Depositions: Allowed for testifying experts post-identification, as per Ky. R. Civ. P. 26.02(4).
  • Interrogatories and Document Requests: Used to identify experts and require the production of relevant reports or materials.

Kentucky distinguishes between testifying and consulting experts. The latter, if not slated to testify, are generally protected from discovery unless there are exceptional circumstances justifying their disclosure.

Limits on Discovery of Expert Materials and Communications

Kentucky maintains certain limitations on the discovery of expert materials and communications. Draft reports, attorney-expert communications, and compensation details are typically protected unless they directly pertain to the expert’s final opinion or bias. Exceptions exist for materials that an expert relies upon in forming their opinion or facts and data considered by the expert.

Significant deviations from federal standards include:

  • The absence of automatic disclosure akin to the federal rule.
  • The strong protection of consulting expert materials unless exceptional circumstances are demonstrated.

Consequences for Noncompliance or Discovery Violations

Failure to comply with expert discovery rules in Kentucky can lead to serious consequences under CRCP 37.01. Sanctions may include:

  • Exclusion of Expert Testimony: If a party fails to disclose an expert or required information.
  • Continuances or Monetary Sanctions: Imposed for significant violations or noncompliance with court orders.

Courts have discretion in enforcing these rules and determining appropriate penalties for discovery violations.

Relevant Rules and Legal Authority in Kentucky

The primary legal authorities governing expert discovery in Kentucky include:

  • Ky. R. Civ. P. 26.02(4): Outlines the scope and methods of expert discovery.
  • Ky. R. Civ. P. 26.05: Addresses the duty to supplement discovery responses.
  • [CRCP 37.01](https://govt.westlaw.com/kyrules/Document/N92361540A91B11DA8F5EE32367A250AE?transitionType=Default): Details sanctions for noncompliance with discovery rules.
  • KRE 702: Pertains to the admissibility of expert testimony, following the Daubert standard.

Key differences from federal discovery practice include the absence of automatic expert disclosures and the necessity of court orders to establish deadlines and procedures for expert discovery. The interaction between discovery and evidence rules underscores the importance of understanding both procedural and substantive requirements to effectively navigate expert discovery in Kentucky.

About the author

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto is a distinguished professional in the legal industry, currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Research at the Expert Institute. With a deep understanding of a broad range of legal practice areas, Zach's expertise encompasses personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, and defective products. His skills are particularly evident in handling complex litigation matters, including high-profile cases such as opioids litigation, NFL concussion litigation, California wildfires, 3M earplugs, Elmiron, transvaginal mesh, Roundup, Camp Lejeune, hernia mesh, IVC filters, Paraquat, Paragard, talcum powder, and Zantac.

Under his leadership, the Expert Institute’s research team has expanded impressively from a single member to a robust team of 100 professionals over the last decade. This growth reflects his ability to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of legal research and expert recruitment effectively. Zach has been instrumental in working on nationally significant litigation matters, including cases involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toxic chemical exposure, and wrongful death, among others.

At the Expert Institute, Zach is responsible for managing all aspects of the research department and developing strategic institutional relationships. He plays a key role in equipping attorneys for success through expert consulting, case management, strategic research, and expert due diligence provided by the Institute’s cloud-based legal services platform, Expert iQ. Zach holds a Bachelor's Degree in Political Science and European History from Vanderbilt University.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.