Iowa Expert Witness Discovery Rules

Iowa's expert discovery rules allow for the disclosure of expert witnesses and their opinions while maintaining protections for certain communications and materials.

ByZach Barreto

Updated on

Iowa capitol

In this article

What Is the Scope of Expert Discovery in Iowa?

In Iowa, expert discovery is governed by rules that allow for the discovery of expert information under specific conditions. Iowa's framework aligns with certain aspects of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) but maintains its distinct provisions. Under Iowa R. Civ. P. 1.508, parties may serve interrogatories requiring opponents to disclose expert witnesses—both retained and non-retained—who are expected to testify. This includes the subject matter of the testimony, the substance of the facts and opinions, and a summary of the grounds for each opinion. However, limits exist on the discovery of expert communications, draft reports, and materials from consulting experts, which are generally protected unless exceptional circumstances justify their disclosure.

Timing and Procedure for Expert Discovery in Iowa

Expert discovery in Iowa typically occurs before trial and follows the disclosure of expert witnesses. The procedural steps include serving interrogatories and, in some cases, expert reports. Iowa law, such as Iowa Code § 147.140 in medical malpractice cases, may require early submission of expert witness certifications. Generally, Iowa courts issue scheduling orders that set deadlines for expert disclosures, including:

  • Plaintiff’s experts: 180 days before trial
  • Defense experts: 90 days before trial

Retained experts are encouraged to provide written reports if available, although not strictly required unless ordered by the court. After disclosure, experts can be deposed under Iowa R. Civ. P. 1.508(2).

What Methods of Expert Discovery Are Permitted in Iowa?

In Iowa, various methods of expert discovery are permitted, including:

  • Depositions: Allowed for disclosed expert witnesses.
  • Interrogatories: Serve to identify expert witnesses and details of their testimony.
  • Document Requests: Available for obtaining relevant materials.

Discovery is generally limited to testifying experts, while consulting experts are protected from discovery unless exceptional circumstances are shown. Iowa rules regarding privilege and work-product protections maintain distinctions similar to federal standards but with specific state nuances.

Limits on Discovery of Expert Materials and Communications

Iowa limits the discovery of draft reports, attorney–expert communications, and compensation details, aligning with federal standards to some extent. Exceptions exist, such as materials that demonstrate bias or contain facts/data considered by the expert. Iowa courts have yet to significantly deviate from federal standards, maintaining protections for privileged communications and work products.

Consequences for Noncompliance or Discovery Violations

Failure to comply with expert discovery rules in Iowa can result in sanctions under Iowa R. Civ. P. 1.517. Potential consequences include:

  • Exclusion of undisclosed experts or unupdated opinions
  • Continuances to allow for proper disclosure
  • Monetary sanctions against non-compliant parties

These sanctions emphasize the importance of adhering to discovery rules and deadlines, ensuring fair trial proceedings.

Relevant Rules and Legal Authority in Iowa

The primary legal authorities governing expert discovery in Iowa include:

  • Iowa R. Civ. P. 1.508: Governs expert discovery procedures.
  • Iowa R. Civ. P. 1.503(4): Addresses the duty to supplement discovery responses.
  • Iowa Code § 147.140: Requires certificates of merit in medical malpractice cases.
  • Iowa R. Civ. P. 1.517: Details sanctions for discovery violations.

Iowa's approach to expert discovery shares similarities with federal practices but includes unique aspects that reflect the state's legal framework. Notably, while resembling federal models, Iowa's rules emphasize state-specific procedures and protections, ensuring comprehensive expert discovery within its jurisdiction.

About the author

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto is a distinguished professional in the legal industry, currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Research at the Expert Institute. With a deep understanding of a broad range of legal practice areas, Zach's expertise encompasses personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, and defective products. His skills are particularly evident in handling complex litigation matters, including high-profile cases such as opioids litigation, NFL concussion litigation, California wildfires, 3M earplugs, Elmiron, transvaginal mesh, Roundup, Camp Lejeune, hernia mesh, IVC filters, Paraquat, Paragard, talcum powder, and Zantac.

Under his leadership, the Expert Institute’s research team has expanded impressively from a single member to a robust team of 100 professionals over the last decade. This growth reflects his ability to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of legal research and expert recruitment effectively. Zach has been instrumental in working on nationally significant litigation matters, including cases involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toxic chemical exposure, and wrongful death, among others.

At the Expert Institute, Zach is responsible for managing all aspects of the research department and developing strategic institutional relationships. He plays a key role in equipping attorneys for success through expert consulting, case management, strategic research, and expert due diligence provided by the Institute’s cloud-based legal services platform, Expert iQ. Zach holds a Bachelor's Degree in Political Science and European History from Vanderbilt University.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.