Illinois Expert Witness Discovery Rules

Illinois expert discovery requires comprehensive disclosure of expert witnesses and opinions, with strict protections for communications and draft reports.

ByZach Barreto

Updated on

Illinois capitol

In this article

What Is the Scope of Expert Discovery in Illinois?

In Illinois, the discovery of expert information is governed by Illinois Supreme Court Rule 213. This rule requires parties to disclose expert witnesses and their opinions comprehensively. Illinois does not follow the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) but has its own distinct framework. Under Rule 213, litigants must identify both "controlled experts" (retained) and independent experts (such as treating physicians) they intend to call at trial, providing detailed disclosures of their testimony subjects well in advance of the court date.

Illinois limits the discovery of expert communications and draft reports. According to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 201(b)(3), these items are generally protected, ensuring that only final opinions and their bases are subject to scrutiny. Consulting expert materials are not discoverable unless exceptional circumstances are demonstrated.

Timing and Procedure for Expert Discovery in Illinois

Expert discovery in Illinois occurs at specified points in the litigation timeline, typically following initial disclosures and as dictated by court orders or local rules. The procedural steps involve the timely exchange of expert information, adherence to court-set deadlines for disclosure, and subsequent deposition of experts as permitted.

  • Disclosure Deadlines: Rule 213 mandates that each party furnish the identities and opinions of their experts with ample time before trial, as governed by court orders or local procedures.
  • Depositions and Interrogatories: Expert depositions are allowed after the required disclosures. The party requesting the deposition must compensate the expert with a reasonable fee, as stipulated by Ill. Sup. Ct. Rule 204(c).

What Methods of Expert Discovery Are Permitted in Illinois?

Illinois permits several methods of expert discovery, including depositions, written interrogatories, and document requests. However, these are primarily limited to testifying experts. The discovery of consulting experts, who do not testify, requires a showing of exceptional circumstances.

  • Testifying Experts: Subject to deposition and complete disclosure of opinions and bases.
  • Consulting Experts: Protected from discovery unless substantial need or exceptional circumstances are shown.

Illinois distinguishes between discovery privileges and work-product protections, safeguarding draft reports and attorney–expert communications under Rule 201(b)(3).

Limits on Discovery of Expert Materials and Communications

Illinois handles the discovery of draft reports and attorney–expert communications with strict protection. Draft reports and preliminary analyses are not discoverable under Rule 201(b)(3), deviating from certain federal practices. Communications between attorneys and experts are similarly shielded, barring discovery unless they pertain directly to the expert's final opinions or the facts and data considered.

  • Exceptions to Protection: Discovery of materials may occur if they reveal bias, form the basis of the expert's opinion, or include facts and data relied upon by the expert.
  • Case Law Influence: Illinois courts have consistently upheld these protective measures, offering a robust defense against overreach in expert discovery.

Consequences for Noncompliance or Discovery Violations

Failure to comply with Illinois's expert discovery rules can lead to significant sanctions under Rule 219. The potential consequences include exclusion of the expert's testimony, imposition of monetary sanctions, or trial continuances. These measures underscore the importance of adherence to procedural requirements.

  • Exclusion of Testimony: Incomplete or untimely disclosures may result in barring the expert from testifying.
  • Monetary Sanctions: Courts may impose financial penalties for discovery violations, emphasizing the obligation to comply with established rules.

Relevant Rules and Legal Authority in Illinois

Expert discovery in Illinois is primarily governed by key state civil procedure rules:

  • [Ill. Sup. Ct. R. 213](https://www.illinoiscourts.gov/Resources/92154f38-e368-4fc0-824c-92bc147ec6da/213.pdf): Governs the disclosure of expert witnesses and their testimony.
  • Ill. Sup. Ct. R. 204(c): Details the requirements and compensation for expert depositions.
  • Ill. Sup. Ct. R. 201(b)(3): Protects draft reports and attorney–expert communications from discovery.

Illinois courts have interpreted these rules through significant appellate decisions, ensuring the state's expert discovery practices reflect both procedural fairness and practical necessity. Notably, Illinois adheres to the Frye standard for the admissibility of novel scientific testimony, affecting admissibility but not the scope of discovery.

For more details on the rules, you can refer to the Illinois Supreme Court Rules.

About the author

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto is a distinguished professional in the legal industry, currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Research at the Expert Institute. With a deep understanding of a broad range of legal practice areas, Zach's expertise encompasses personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, and defective products. His skills are particularly evident in handling complex litigation matters, including high-profile cases such as opioids litigation, NFL concussion litigation, California wildfires, 3M earplugs, Elmiron, transvaginal mesh, Roundup, Camp Lejeune, hernia mesh, IVC filters, Paraquat, Paragard, talcum powder, and Zantac.

Under his leadership, the Expert Institute’s research team has expanded impressively from a single member to a robust team of 100 professionals over the last decade. This growth reflects his ability to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of legal research and expert recruitment effectively. Zach has been instrumental in working on nationally significant litigation matters, including cases involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toxic chemical exposure, and wrongful death, among others.

At the Expert Institute, Zach is responsible for managing all aspects of the research department and developing strategic institutional relationships. He plays a key role in equipping attorneys for success through expert consulting, case management, strategic research, and expert due diligence provided by the Institute’s cloud-based legal services platform, Expert iQ. Zach holds a Bachelor's Degree in Political Science and European History from Vanderbilt University.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.