Delaware Expert Witness Discovery Rules

Delaware's expert discovery framework emphasizes unique procedural rules, timing for disclosures, and protections for expert communications, ensuring balanced transparency.

ByZach Barreto

Updated on

Delaware capitol

In this article

What Is the Scope of Expert Discovery in Delaware?

Expert discovery in Delaware involves the permissible disclosure and examination of expert information under state law. Unlike the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4), Delaware follows its distinct framework, primarily governed by the Delaware Superior Court Civil Rules. Rule 26(b)(4) specifically addresses the discovery of expert testimony, allowing parties to depose the opposing party's expert witnesses once their opinions have been disclosed, typically through expert reports.

Delaware imposes limits on the discovery of expert communications and materials. Under Rule 26(b)(5), the state generally protects draft expert reports and communications between attorneys and experts, reflecting the principles of the work-product doctrine. These protections are in line with the federal approach but are tailored to Delaware's own procedural nuances.

Timing and Procedure for Expert Discovery in Delaware

In Delaware, expert discovery is strategically timed, occurring after the initial disclosures and often guided by scheduling orders as per Rule 16 of the Delaware Superior Court Civil Rules. Typically, the plaintiff is required to disclose expert witnesses, including a detailed summary of their opinions, well before the trial—usually 90 to 120 days prior. The defendant follows with their expert disclosures thereafter.

Key procedural steps in Delaware include:

  • Exchange of Expert Information: Mandated by court orders, requiring comprehensive reports or summaries from retained experts.
  • Depositions: Permitted after the expert's opinions are disclosed, facilitating a deeper exploration of expert testimony.
  • Supplementation: Obligated under Rule 26(e), ensuring parties update disclosures with any new information.

Failure to comply with these procedures can result in the exclusion of expert testimony as outlined in Rule 37.

What Methods of Expert Discovery Are Permitted in Delaware?

Delaware permits several methods for expert discovery, including:

  • Depositions: Allowed after the disclosure of expert opinions, aiding in the examination of the expert's bases and methodologies.
  • Interrogatories and Document Requests: Focused on obtaining detailed information regarding the expert's opinions, qualifications, and compensation.

Discovery in Delaware primarily targets testifying experts, with limited scope regarding consulting experts unless exceptional circumstances warrant otherwise. Privilege and work-product protections play a significant role, particularly concerning non-testifying expert materials.

Limits on Discovery of Expert Materials and Communications

Delaware adheres to specific limits on the discovery of expert materials and communications. Rule 26(b)(5) aligns with federal standards by safeguarding draft reports and attorney-expert communications from discovery. Exceptions to these protections may arise when addressing issues of bias, reliance materials, or facts/data considered by the expert.

Significant case law in Delaware further illustrates these protections and exceptions, ensuring a balanced approach between transparency and privilege.

Consequences for Noncompliance or Discovery Violations

Noncompliance with expert discovery rules in Delaware can lead to several consequences, as delineated in Rule 37. These may include:

  • Exclusion of Expert Testimony: Preventing the introduction of undisclosed or improperly disclosed expert evidence.
  • Monetary Sanctions: Imposing financial penalties for discovery violations.
  • Continuances: Allowing additional time to rectify discovery issues.

These measures emphasize the importance of adhering to procedural rules and deadlines in expert discovery.

Relevant Rules and Legal Authority in Delaware

Delaware's expert discovery is governed by several key rules and legal authorities:

  • **Del. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 26(b)(4)**: Governs the discovery of expert testimony.
  • Del. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 26(e): Mandates supplementation of expert disclosures.
  • **Del. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 37**: Addresses sanctions for discovery violations.
  • Del. R. Evid. 702: Pertains to the admissibility and reliability of expert testimony.

These rules reflect Delaware's unique approach to expert discovery, with notable differences from federal practice, particularly regarding the timing and scope of disclosures and the protection of expert materials.

About the author

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto is a distinguished professional in the legal industry, currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Research at the Expert Institute. With a deep understanding of a broad range of legal practice areas, Zach's expertise encompasses personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, and defective products. His skills are particularly evident in handling complex litigation matters, including high-profile cases such as opioids litigation, NFL concussion litigation, California wildfires, 3M earplugs, Elmiron, transvaginal mesh, Roundup, Camp Lejeune, hernia mesh, IVC filters, Paraquat, Paragard, talcum powder, and Zantac.

Under his leadership, the Expert Institute’s research team has expanded impressively from a single member to a robust team of 100 professionals over the last decade. This growth reflects his ability to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of legal research and expert recruitment effectively. Zach has been instrumental in working on nationally significant litigation matters, including cases involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toxic chemical exposure, and wrongful death, among others.

At the Expert Institute, Zach is responsible for managing all aspects of the research department and developing strategic institutional relationships. He plays a key role in equipping attorneys for success through expert consulting, case management, strategic research, and expert due diligence provided by the Institute’s cloud-based legal services platform, Expert iQ. Zach holds a Bachelor's Degree in Political Science and European History from Vanderbilt University.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.