Expert Witness Compensation Rules in Oklahoma
Oklahoma's rules on expert witness compensation emphasize fair pay, clear agreements, and distinctions between retained experts and treating physicians.
Updated on
In this article
What Are the Rules Governing Expert Witness Compensation in Oklahoma?
In Oklahoma, expert witness compensation is governed by a combination of statutes, case law, and ethical guidelines. These rules ensure that expert witnesses are fairly compensated for their time and expertise while maintaining the objectivity and integrity of the judicial process. Understanding these rules is crucial for legal practitioners to effectively navigate the complexities of expert witness engagement in litigation.
Fee Provisions in Oklahoma Rules of Civil Procedure
The Oklahoma Rules of Civil Procedure provide a framework for the engagement and compensation of expert witnesses. While the rules do not explicitly set forth a standard fee structure, they imply that compensation must be reasonable and reflective of the expert's qualifications and the complexity of the case. Typically, the fees are negotiated between the expert and the retaining party, with consideration given to factors such as:
- The expert's credentials and reputation
- The nature and complexity of the issues involved
- The time commitment required for preparation and testimony
These components ensure that expert witnesses are compensated appropriately while preventing exorbitant fees that could skew the fairness of the judicial process.
Understanding Oklahoma Statute §12-3226: Payment Guidelines for Expert Witnesses
Oklahoma Statute §12-3226 provides specific guidelines regarding the payment of expert witnesses. This statute outlines the process for discovery and the role of expert witnesses within that framework. Under §12-3226, a party may depose any person identified as an expert whose opinions may be presented at trial. The statute also provides that the party seeking discovery must pay the expert a reasonable fee for time spent in responding to discovery, including depositions.
The statute ensures that experts are compensated for their time while participating in discovery procedures, emphasizing the importance of fairness and equity in the litigation process. This provision is crucial for maintaining the accessibility and availability of qualified experts, as it ensures they receive fair remuneration for their contributions.
Distinction Between Retained Experts and Treating Physicians Regarding Compensation in Oklahoma
In Oklahoma, there is a clear distinction between retained experts and treating physicians regarding compensation. Retained experts are typically engaged specifically for the purpose of litigation, and their compensation is based on an agreement with the retaining party. These experts are remunerated for their time spent on preparation, analysis, and testimony.
Conversely, treating physicians are those who have provided care to a patient independently of litigation. When called to testify, they may receive compensation for their time away from their medical practice but are generally not paid for the time spent forming opinions, as those opinions are based on their prior treatment of the patient. This distinction is significant because:
- Retained experts are paid for preparation and testimony as part of their professional services.
- Treating physicians are compensated for the inconvenience and time lost from their practice but not for forming new opinions.
This differentiation ensures that compensation remains equitable and reflects the role each expert plays in the litigation process.
Practical Tips for Structuring Expert Witness Fee Agreements in Oklahoma
When engaging expert witnesses in Oklahoma, structuring a clear and fair fee agreement is essential to avoid disputes and ensure a smooth litigation process. Here are some practical tips for legal practitioners when drafting fee agreements with expert witnesses:
- Clearly Define Services: Outline the specific services the expert will provide, including consulting, analysis, report preparation, and courtroom testimony. This clarity helps both parties understand their obligations.
- Establish Reasonable Fees: Research typical fee ranges for experts in the relevant field and ensure that the agreed-upon fees reflect the expert's qualifications, experience, and the complexity of the case.
- Include Payment Terms: Specify the payment structure, whether it’s hourly, flat rate, or retainer-based. Additionally, outline payment timelines, such as upfront deposits, milestone payments, or upon completion of services.
- Address Expenses: Clearly state how expenses related to travel, lodging, and materials will be handled. This prevents misunderstandings regarding additional costs incurred during the expert's engagement.
- Incorporate Cancellation Terms: Include provisions for cancellation or rescheduling of services, specifying any fees or penalties that may apply if either party needs to cancel.
- Define Confidentiality Obligations: Ensure that confidentiality is addressed in the agreement, particularly regarding proprietary information or sensitive case details that the expert may encounter.
- Detail Dispute Resolution Procedures: Establish a method for resolving disputes related to the agreement, whether through mediation, arbitration, or litigation, to facilitate a smoother resolution process if issues arise.
By following these guidelines, legal practitioners can create comprehensive and equitable fee agreements that protect both the expert witness's interests and the integrity of the litigation process.
About the author
Zach Barreto
Zach Barreto is a distinguished professional in the legal industry, currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Research at the Expert Institute. With a deep understanding of a broad range of legal practice areas, Zach's expertise encompasses personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, defective products, and many other sectors. His skills are particularly evident in handling complex litigation matters, including high-profile cases like the Opioids litigation, NFL Concussion Litigation, California Wildfires, 3M earplugs, Elmiron, Transvaginal Mesh, NFL Concussion Litigation, Roundup, Camp Lejeune, Hernia Mesh, IVC filters, Paraquat, Paragard, Talcum Powder, Zantac, and many others.
Under his leadership, the Expert Institute’s research team has expanded impressively from a single member to a robust team of 100 professionals over the last decade. This growth reflects his ability to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of legal research and expert recruitment effectively. Zach has been instrumental in working on nationally significant litigation matters, including cases involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toxic chemical exposure, and wrongful death, among others.
At the Expert Institute, Zach is responsible for managing all aspects of the research department and developing strategic institutional relationships. He plays a key role in equipping attorneys for success through expert consulting, case management, strategic research, and expert due diligence provided by the Institute’s cloud-based legal services platform, Expert iQ.
Educationally, Zach holds a Bachelor's degree in Political Science and European History from Vanderbilt University.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.
Sign up nowA Sample Voir Dire: How To Qualify An Expert Witness
Download free white paperChallenging Opposing Experts: Advanced Research Techniques
Download free white paperCross Examining Expert Witnesses: The Ultimate Guide
Download free white paper
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.