Expert Witness Compensation Rules in Delaware

Delaware's rules on expert witness compensation focus on fair payment, judicial oversight, and ethical standards, distinguishing between retained experts and treating physicians.

ByZach Barreto

Updated on

Delaware capitol

In this article

What Are the Rules Governing Expert Witness Compensation in Delaware?

In Delaware, the rules governing expert witness compensation are defined by a combination of statutory provisions and case law. The state's legal framework ensures that expert witnesses are compensated fairly for their services while maintaining the integrity of the judicial process. Understanding these rules is crucial for attorneys, expert witnesses, and legal professionals who engage in litigation within the state.

Understanding Delaware Code Title 10, § 8906: Payment Guidelines for Expert Witnesses

Delaware Code Title 10, § 8906, is the primary statute governing the payment of expert witnesses. This provision outlines the entitlement of expert witnesses to reasonable compensation. The statute specifies that the court shall determine the amount of compensation based on several factors, including the complexity of the testimony and the expertise required.

Key points under § 8906 include:

  • Reasonable Compensation: The statute requires that expert witnesses receive payment that reflects the nature of their expertise and the value of their contribution to the case.
  • Judicial Oversight: The court retains discretion to assess and approve the fees submitted by expert witnesses, ensuring that the amounts are justifiable and aligned with customary rates.
  • Expense Reimbursement: Expert witnesses may also be entitled to reimbursement for expenses incurred in connection with their testimony, subject to court approval.

Distinction Between Retained Experts and Treating Physicians in Delaware

In Delaware, a clear distinction is made between retained experts and treating physicians when it comes to compensation and testimony. Retained experts are those specifically hired to provide expert opinions for litigation purposes, while treating physicians are those who have provided medical care to a party involved in the case.

  • Retained Experts: These professionals are compensated for their services as expert witnesses, and their fees are subject to court approval under § 8906. They are typically required to provide detailed reports and testify regarding their opinions.
  • Treating Physicians: Generally, treating physicians provide testimony based on their treatment of the patient, and they are not considered "retained" for litigation purposes. Their compensation is usually limited to reasonable fees for their time spent in deposition or court, distinct from any fees for preparing detailed expert reports.

This distinction is crucial because it affects how fees are calculated and approved by the court. Retained experts often command higher fees due to the specialized nature of their testimony, whereas treating physicians are compensated more modestly, reflecting their role as fact witnesses rather than expert witnesses.

Delaware Ethics Opinions and Guidelines on Expert Witness Fees

Delaware's legal community adheres to ethical guidelines that govern the compensation of expert witnesses. These guidelines ensure that compensation arrangements do not compromise the objectivity or credibility of expert testimony. The Delaware State Bar Association and other legal entities provide opinions and guidelines that reinforce these principles.

  • Ethical Considerations: Compensation should not be contingent upon the outcome of the case, as this could bias the expert's testimony. Legal professionals are advised to structure fee agreements that reflect the time, effort, and expertise required without linking payment to case results.
  • Transparency and Disclosure: Attorneys are encouraged to disclose the nature and extent of expert compensation during discovery, fostering transparency and allowing for fair examination of potential biases.

Compliance with these ethical standards is vital for maintaining the integrity of expert testimony and ensuring that the judicial process remains impartial and fair.

Practical Tips for Structuring Expert Witness Fee Agreements in Delaware

When structuring fee agreements for expert witnesses in Delaware, it is essential to adhere to the legal standards and ethical guidelines that govern compensation. Properly crafted agreements can help ensure compliance with Delaware Code Title 10, § 8906, and ethical considerations, fostering a transparent and fair legal process. Here are some practical tips:

  • Clear Terms and Conditions: Clearly outline the scope of work, including the specific tasks the expert is expected to perform, such as report preparation, deposition, and trial testimony. This clarity helps manage expectations and prevents disputes over compensation.
  • Reasonable Fee Structure: Establish a fee structure that reflects the expert's qualifications, the complexity of the case, and customary rates. This approach aligns with the statute's requirement for reasonable compensation.
  • Expense Provisions: Include provisions for reimbursing reasonable expenses incurred by the expert witness, such as travel, accommodation, and materials, ensuring these are subject to court approval.
  • Non-Contingency Clause: Explicitly state that compensation is not contingent upon the outcome of the case. This helps maintain the expert's objectivity and complies with ethical guidelines.
  • Regular Billing and Documentation: Implement a system for regular billing and documentation of services rendered and expenses incurred. This practice supports transparency and facilitates court review of submitted fees.
  • Advance Court Approval: Where possible, seek advance approval from the court for the terms of the expert witness fee agreement. This proactive step can prevent potential disputes over compensation amounts and align with judicial oversight requirements.

By following these tips, attorneys and expert witnesses can create fee agreements that not only comply with the relevant legal and ethical standards in Delaware but also contribute to a fair and efficient litigation process.

About the author

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto

Zach Barreto is a distinguished professional in the legal industry, currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Research at the Expert Institute. With a deep understanding of a broad range of legal practice areas, Zach's expertise encompasses personal injury, medical malpractice, mass torts, defective products, and many other sectors. His skills are particularly evident in handling complex litigation matters, including high-profile cases like the Opioids litigation, NFL Concussion Litigation, California Wildfires, 3M earplugs, Elmiron, Transvaginal Mesh, NFL Concussion Litigation, Roundup, Camp Lejeune, Hernia Mesh, IVC filters, Paraquat, Paragard, Talcum Powder, Zantac, and many others.

Under his leadership, the Expert Institute’s research team has expanded impressively from a single member to a robust team of 100 professionals over the last decade. This growth reflects his ability to navigate the intricate and demanding landscape of legal research and expert recruitment effectively. Zach has been instrumental in working on nationally significant litigation matters, including cases involving pharmaceuticals, medical devices, toxic chemical exposure, and wrongful death, among others.

At the Expert Institute, Zach is responsible for managing all aspects of the research department and developing strategic institutional relationships. He plays a key role in equipping attorneys for success through expert consulting, case management, strategic research, and expert due diligence provided by the Institute’s cloud-based legal services platform, Expert iQ.

Educationally, Zach holds a Bachelor's degree in Political Science and European History from Vanderbilt University.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.