Cybersecurity Litigation

Cybersecurity litigation is evolving, addressing data breaches, corporate liability, and emerging legal complexities as interconnected systems drive new risks.

Cybersecurity

In this article

Cybersecurity lawsuits typically seek compensation after individuals or organizations suffer harm from a data breach or other data systems issue. As the world becomes ever more interconnected, data breaches and resulting harms will continue to drive cybersecurity litigation.

Common Causes of Cybersecurity Lawsuits

“Cybersecurity lawsuits” is a large category, encompassing a range of issues related to data sharing and storage, data encryption, and both hardware and software protections.

To date, most cybersecurity litigation claims fall under one of two headings: data breaches and corporate liability.

Data Breaches

Data repositories are a popular target for cyberattacks. Collections of personal identifying information (PII), including names, addresses, and Social Security and credit card numbers, offer opportunities for mass-scale identity theft. Consequently, many recent cybersecurity cases have focused on data breaches.

Data breaches frequently beget class action lawsuits. Consumers whose information is breached face similar harm from the same event or events and typically seek similar remedies.

Corporate Liability

To address harm from cyberattacks, federal, state, and some local lawmakers have enacted cybersecurity laws and standards. Companies that fail to adhere to these standards risk facing corporate liability if their failure is exploited in a cyberattack. Many cybersecurity lawsuits, including those that focus on data breaches, rest on a theory of corporate liability.

Early Case Studies in Cybersecurity Litigation

Over the past decade, landmark cybersecurity lawsuits have begun shaping this area of law. Key cases include:

  • Target Data: In 2013, Target suffered a data breach that stole 70 million customer records and 40 million credit/debit records. The company paid an $18.5 million settlement. Customers’ loss of faith in the company’s security reverberated for years, affecting Target’s brand and bottom line.
  • 23andMe: Genetics testing company 23andMe faced a data leak that exposed personal information of 7 million customers. In 2024, 23andMe agreed to pay a $30 million settlement.
  • Equifax: In September 2017, Equifax announced a data breach had exposed approximately 147 million customers’ personal financial information. The resulting $425 million settlement is among the largest ever recorded in a cybersecurity case to date.
  • Delta Airlines: A 2024 CrowdStrike tech glitch caused outages at Delta Airlines and other businesses worldwide. In October 2024, Delta sued CrowdStrike, claiming CrowdStrike’s negligence had caused the outage, resulting in thousands of canceled flights and millions in lost revenue and expenses to the airline.

Subsequent cases will continue to refine points raised in these early claims and to explore new legal questions.

Litigation Processes in Cybersecurity Lawsuits

Broadly, litigation processes in cybersecurity lawsuits follow settled practices for civil procedure. In practice, certain points within this process receive greater emphasis. Emerging patterns in cybersecurity litigation processes include:

  • Pre-trial procedures: Cybersecurity litigation is a developing area of law, with many unknowns. Consequently, many parties have emphasized pre-filing negotiations and demand letters as a way to address issues before entering the litigation process.
  • Trial vs. settlement: To date, most large cybersecurity cases have reached settlement before trial. The spate of unanswered questions in this area tends to encourage parties to settle rather than risk a loss at trial.
  • Privilege and Confidentiality: Many cybersecurity cases focus on data breaches. Because PII lies at the heart of the case, strong controls for privileged communications are a must. Often, parties and their counsel find themselves learning best practices in data protection to manage information properly during the case, as well as to discuss issues of negligence or noncompliance.

The Delta v. CrowdStrike case demonstrates a turn away from cybersecurity as a purely class action, consumer-driven matter. As more companies seek compensation from one another, points of procedural emphasis may change as well.

Challenges in Cybersecurity Litigation

Cybersecurity litigation also raises certain substantive and procedural challenges. Common challenges in these cases include:

  • Standing: Demonstrating “actual or imminent harm” can be challenging for plaintiffs, particularly when most people may never know their personal information was compromised.
  • Negligence: The law regarding duty of care and breach thereof is still developing in cases of cybersecurity information breaches and other digital issues. Demonstrating cause in fact or proximate cause can also prove challenging.
  • Class Action Issues: Some cases, such as the Equifax case, involve millions of plaintiffs. Managing a class of this size, which can span every US state and territory, can pose significant challenges related to information management, choice of venue and jurisdiction, coordination of attorney efforts, and more.

As cybersecurity litigation diversifies, additional challenges are likely to arise.

Legal Trends and Future Outlook

Cybersecurity law is developing in a rapidly-changing context. While courts and the public are only beginning to understand the complexities of PII breaches, ransomware attacks have increased, posing a new avenue for litigation and legal questions. A need to reconcile conflicting decisions at the trial level will also increase the volume of cases heading to courts of appeals. As legislators attempt to address cybersecurity, compliance with statutory and regulatory demands will shape questions of fault as well.

Recent years demonstrate a rising trend of cybersecurity breaches leading to litigation. This trend is likely to continue, embracing new forms of cyber attacks and new methods to prevent and remediate these attacks.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the common causes of cybersecurity lawsuits?

Common causes of cybersecurity lawsuits include data breaches, where personal identifying information is compromised, and corporate liability due to failure to adhere to cybersecurity laws and standards.

How can companies avoid corporate liability in cybersecurity cases?

Companies can avoid corporate liability in cybersecurity cases by adhering to established cybersecurity laws and standards, implementing robust data protection measures, and conducting regular security audits to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

What challenges do plaintiffs face in cybersecurity litigation?

Plaintiffs in cybersecurity litigation face challenges such as demonstrating "actual or imminent harm," navigating developing laws regarding negligence, and managing complex class action issues with potentially millions of plaintiffs.

About the author

Dani Alexis Ryskamp, J.D.

Dani Alexis Ryskamp, J.D.

Dani Alexis Ryskamp, J.D., is a multifaceted legal professional with extensive experience in insurance defense, personal injury, and medical malpractice law. Her diverse background includes valuable internships in criminal defense, which have enriched her understanding of various legal sectors. She served as the Executive Note Editor of the Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, demonstrating a strong commitment to legal scholarship. Dani graduated with a J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School in 2007, following a summa cum laude B.A. in English from Ferris State University in 2004. She is an active member of the Michigan State Bar and the American Bar Association, reflecting her dedication to the legal profession.

Currently, Dani has channeled her legal expertise into a successful career as a freelance writer and book critic, primarily focusing on the legal and literary markets. Her writing portfolio encompasses a wide range of topics, including landmark settlements in medical negligence cases, jury awards in personal injury lawsuits, and analyses of legal trial tactics. Her work not only showcases her legal acumen but also her exceptional ability to communicate complex legal issues effectively to a broader audience. Dani's unique blend of legal practice experience and her prowess in legal writing positions her at the intersection of law and literature, allowing her to contribute meaningfully to both fields.

Dani earned her Bachelor of Arts in English from Ferris State University, where she was involved in various activities, including serving as a tutor at the Writing Center, editor in chief of the Muskegon River Review, president of the Dead Poets' Society, secretary of the Public Administration Association, and a member of the varsity synchronized skating team. She obtained her Doctor of Law from the University of Michigan Law School, participating in the Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Wolverine Street Law Moot Court, and the Mock Trial Team. Additionally, Dani holds a Master of Arts in English Language and Literature/Letters from Western Michigan University, where she was a graduate assistant for the Hilltop Review.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.