California AG Sues Nursing Home Chain Over Alleged Ratings Manipulations

California sues Brookdale Senior Living, alleging false CMS ratings and improper patient discharges that risk safety. Case raises concerns over nursing home accountability.

brookdale senior living

Prosecutors in California recently brought suit against Brookdale Senior Living, Inc., the largest senior living facility operator in the U.S. Based in Tennessee, Brookdale operates 10 facilities in the state of California.

The lawsuit against Brookdale accuses the company of ignoring patient safety rules upon patient discharge. It also alleges that Brookdale provided false information to the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS). This resulted in CMS providing Brookdale with falsely inflated quality ratings.

The Claims Against Brookdale Senior Living

The claims against Brookdale fall into two major categories: misinformation regarding patient discharges and inaccuracies reported to CMS. The first category of claims focuses on Brookdale’s activities. These activities include the transfer of patients to another facility or the discharge of patients from a Brookdale facility. Under law, skilled nursing facilities are required to provide patients and families with notice of a transfer or discharge at least 30 days in advance, or “as soon as practicable” in cases like emergencies.

The lawsuit alleges that Brookdale Senior Living failed to provide this notice to patients transferred or discharged. As a result, the lawsuit claims that Brookdale endangered patients’ health and caused undue stress. Additionally, it alleges Brookdale created concern for families who had to quickly find care for family members transferred or discharged.

These transfers or discharges adversely affected several patients, according to the lawsuit. For instance, one report describes an 80-year-old patient with Alzheimer’s disease, congestive heart failure, and other medical conditions. Brookdale allegedly released the patient without proper notice or a discharge plan. A few days later, the patient was in the hospital. The facility allegedly released another patient, aged 78, without proper notice or a care plan for pneumonia recovery. The patient still had a medication catheter upon release. Brookdale didn’t give the family information on how to administer medication or supplemental oxygen, according to the lawsuit.

False Information

Second, the lawsuit alleges that Brookdale reported false information to CMS. The information in question directly affects CMS’s five-star rating system. The agency uses this system to inform the public about the quality of care at various skilled nursing facilities.

In its case against Brookdale, California claims that the nursing home company overreported its nursing staffing hours to CMS. CMS, in turn, used this information to award Brookdale facilities four- and five-star ratings. The agency would not have rewarded Brookdale if the facility reported the nursing staffing hours accurately. California alleges that this misrepresentation violates the state’s Unfair Competition Law and its False Advertising Law.

A New Frontier for COVID-19 Claims

Early COVID-19-related claims against nursing homes focused on nursing home responses to the first waves of the disease. These lawsuits targeted nursing home actions as the pandemic swept through facilities, claiming lives and sickening staff and residents alike.

These early claims, however, represent only the first wave of legal responses against nursing homes, skilled nursing facilities, and other care facilities to arise in the wake of the pandemic.

The case against Brookdale does not focus on the company’s behavior in the context of the pandemic specifically. Rather, it focuses on issues that endanger patients and misinform both patients and families. These are issues whose consequences can exacerbate in a pandemic scenario.

Patients and families rely on skilled nursing care. For instance, skilled nursing facilities provide specialized assistance that the family or patient cannot administer at home. When these facilities fail to follow transfer or discharge rules, they put both patients and their families at risk.

Similarly, patients and families rely on CMS ratings as an unbiased source of information about nursing home care. CMS, in turn, charges care facilities with accurately reporting data about their staffing, facilities, and other features. When information is not reported to CMS accurately, the agency cannot provide a clear comparison to families and patients between various care facilities.

Experts Who May Be Required in the Brookdale Case

The claims against Brookdale include cases of improper or inadequate transfer or discharge notice. Therefore, counsel will likely call experts who can discuss what proper transfer or discharge notice and instructions would look like. For example, experts in gerontology, wound care, and other fields may be asked to opine on the likely effects of Brookdale’s actions, as well as on the standard of care for patient discharge. To address the CMS rating aspects of the case, attorneys may call upon experts on CMS compliance, as well as the agency’s use of collected data to assign ratings.

The lawsuit against Brookdale seeks a permanent injunction against the company, as well as a $2,500 civil penalty for each violation of the California Business and Professions code proven at trial.

About the author

Dani Alexis Ryskamp, J.D.

Dani Alexis Ryskamp, J.D.

Dani Alexis Ryskamp, J.D., is a multifaceted legal professional with extensive experience in insurance defense, personal injury, and medical malpractice law. Her diverse background includes valuable internships in criminal defense, which have enriched her understanding of various legal sectors. She served as the Executive Note Editor of the Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, demonstrating a strong commitment to legal scholarship. Dani graduated with a J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School in 2007, following a summa cum laude B.A. in English from Ferris State University in 2004. She is an active member of the Michigan State Bar and the American Bar Association, reflecting her dedication to the legal profession.

Currently, Dani has channeled her legal expertise into a successful career as a freelance writer and book critic, primarily focusing on the legal and literary markets. Her writing portfolio encompasses a wide range of topics, including landmark settlements in medical negligence cases, jury awards in personal injury lawsuits, and analyses of legal trial tactics. Her work not only showcases her legal acumen but also her exceptional ability to communicate complex legal issues effectively to a broader audience. Dani's unique blend of legal practice experience and her prowess in legal writing positions her at the intersection of law and literature, allowing her to contribute meaningfully to both fields.

Dani earned her Bachelor of Arts in English from Ferris State University, where she was involved in various activities, including serving as a tutor at the Writing Center, editor in chief of the Muskegon River Review, president of the Dead Poets' Society, secretary of the Public Administration Association, and a member of the varsity synchronized skating team. She obtained her Doctor of Law from the University of Michigan Law School, participating in the Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Wolverine Street Law Moot Court, and the Mock Trial Team. Additionally, Dani holds a Master of Arts in English Language and Literature/Letters from Western Michigan University, where she was a graduate assistant for the Hilltop Review.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.