Apple Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Allegedly Defective MacBook Keyboards

Apple faces a class action lawsuit claiming MacBook and MacBook Pro keyboards with the “butterfly” mechanism are defective, sparking consumer frustration and legal action.

Apple Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Allegedly Defective MacBook Keyboards

A recent lawsuit filed in the Northern District of California claims that thousands of MacBook owners are struggling with an alleged defect in certain Apple laptops that has reportedly caused numerous keyboard malfunctions.

According to the lawsuit, users started experiencing problems with the “butterfly” style keyboards in MacBook and MacBook Pro laptops not long after the 2015 models were introduced. Nonetheless, the lawsuit claims, Apple kept not only selling the laptops with the same keyboards, but charged a premium price for them.

“The MacBook suffers from a latent defect,” the plaintiffs stated in their complaint. “As numerous online complaints describe, not long after consumers purchase the MacBook, their keyboard begins to suffer from a host of problems including keys sticking, keystrokes failing to register, keys typing a letter or command multiple times even though [@portabletext/react] Unknown block type "span", specify a component for it in the `components.types` prop was struck only once, and keys simply not working at all.”

Apple offers a one-year warranty on the MacBook and MacBook Pro laptops. The company also has an online support page that offers cleaning instructions for the keyboard.

The lawsuit, however, claims that these measures are insufficient to prevent or fix the problem. Rather, the lawsuit alleges that Apple “routinely refuses to honor its warranty obligations,” instead telling MacBook owners “to try self-help remedies that it knows will not result in a permanent repair.”

The complaint seeks $5 million in damages under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. It also seeks certification of a class of MacBook and MacBook Pro purchasers with affected devices.

What’s Wrong With the MacBook Keyboard?

Most laptop keyboards use a “scissor” mechanism to allow the keys to function properly, without sticking or failing to register keystrokes. This mechanism is designed to account for the fact that, over time, laptop keyboards accumulate dust and dirt beneath the keys, and to allow the keys to keep working even as dust builds up.

The keys on the MacBooks involved in the lawsuit, however, use a “butterfly” mechanism. This mechanism allowed Apple to make a keyboard that was 40 percent thinner than “scissor” type keyboards – but that also appears to have caused serious problems for users.

An AppleInsider study found that “the 2016 MacBook Pro keyboard is failing twice as often in the first year of use as the 2014 or 2015 MacBook Pro models.” While the 2017 model appears to be failing less often than the 2016, AppleInsider noted, “but not by a lot.”

Both plaintiffs in the lawsuit sought to have their MacBooks repaired at Apple stores in their respective cities, only to face frustrations. One was told the repair would take over a week and was offered the opportunity to purchase an additional external keyboard for $139 instead. The other brought his laptop to Apple for repairs, only to be told that since the warranty had expired, the plaintiff would be responsible for the full cost of the repair – which was quoted at “over $700,” according to the complaint.

Frustrations over the failing MacBook keyboards led over 23,000 people to sign a Change.org petition asking Apple to “recall every MacBook Pro released since late 2016, and replace the keyboards on all of them with new, redesigned keyboards that just work.”

Product Liability Lawsuits in an Internet Era: Evidence and Questions

While the Apple lawsuit isn’t the first to find its complaints echoed in online forums, the initial filing is one of only a few to date that makes heavy reference to these online complaints as it builds its case.

For instance, the complaint specifically references Apple’s advertising, which appeared both on- and offline, claiming that the MacBooks involved in the lawsuit featured a “more responsive keyboard.” The complaint also cites the Change.org petition, noting that the petition had gained over 17,000 signatures in its first week online.

The complaint also examines Apple’s online purchasing options, noting that “the online purchase portal does not – and never did – disclose that the MacBook is prone to keyboard failure.” Neither does the MacBook’s packaging, according to the complaint.

The complaint even digs into comments made in online MacBook user forums, including the forum run at discussions.apple.com, Apple’s official website. “Consumers described MacBook keyboard failures in public forums immediately after the MacBook was released and immediately after the MacBook Pro was released,” the complaint notes, offering several examples from the weeks immediately following the MacBook’s April 2015 release and the MacBook Pro’s October 2016 release.

The Internet has changed communication in profound ways – including how we communicate frustrations and complaints about consumer products. While the questions raised by the Apple complaint have yet to be addressed in court, the ways in which the complaint uses the MacBook user community as a resource to demonstrate the foundation of a widespread functionality problem with the “butterfly” keyboards raises broader questions for the organization of similar product defect lawsuits in the future.

About the author

Dani Alexis Ryskamp, J.D.

Dani Alexis Ryskamp, J.D.

Dani Alexis Ryskamp, J.D., is a multifaceted legal professional with extensive experience in insurance defense, personal injury, and medical malpractice law. Her diverse background includes valuable internships in criminal defense, which have enriched her understanding of various legal sectors. She served as the Executive Note Editor of the Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, demonstrating a strong commitment to legal scholarship. Dani graduated with a J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School in 2007, following a summa cum laude B.A. in English from Ferris State University in 2004. She is an active member of the Michigan State Bar and the American Bar Association, reflecting her dedication to the legal profession.

Currently, Dani has channeled her legal expertise into a successful career as a freelance writer and book critic, primarily focusing on the legal and literary markets. Her writing portfolio encompasses a wide range of topics, including landmark settlements in medical negligence cases, jury awards in personal injury lawsuits, and analyses of legal trial tactics. Her work not only showcases her legal acumen but also her exceptional ability to communicate complex legal issues effectively to a broader audience. Dani's unique blend of legal practice experience and her prowess in legal writing positions her at the intersection of law and literature, allowing her to contribute meaningfully to both fields.

Dani earned her Bachelor of Arts in English from Ferris State University, where she was involved in various activities, including serving as a tutor at the Writing Center, editor in chief of the Muskegon River Review, president of the Dead Poets' Society, secretary of the Public Administration Association, and a member of the varsity synchronized skating team. She obtained her Doctor of Law from the University of Michigan Law School, participating in the Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Wolverine Street Law Moot Court, and the Mock Trial Team. Additionally, Dani holds a Master of Arts in English Language and Literature/Letters from Western Michigan University, where she was a graduate assistant for the Hilltop Review.

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.