Urologist Permanently Damages Patient During Catheter Insertion

ByVictoria Negron

|

Updated onJanuary 10, 2022

Urologist Permanently Damages Patient During Catheter Insertion

This case involves a 64-year-old male patient with a history of urinary incontinence who had his prostate gland surgically removed. He presented to a urologist for a bulking agent injection to help with his incontinence. The day after the procedure, the patient experienced severe abdominal pain and returned to the urologist’s office. He was diagnosed with an obstructed urethra. The urologist attempted to pass a catheter through the patient’s urethra several times to break through the obstruction, but each attempt failed. Because of the significant force used to insert the catheter, the patient suffered severe trauma to his urethra. An expert in urology was sought to review the facts of the case and determine whether or not the attending urologist performed the procedure in question according to the standard of care.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

1. Please describe your background in urology.

2. Do you routinely treat patients like the one described above?

3. Have you ever had a patient sustain this injury due to improper catheter insertion? What was the result?

Expert Witness Response E-009659

inline imageI have performed over 500 radical prostatectomies and I am very familiar with the complication of urinary incontinence. I routinely treat patients for prostate cancer with radical prostatectomy. And I take care of any of my patients who have urinary incontinence as a result. Bulking agents are FDA approved treatments for this condition. The patient seems to have had the well-documented complication of urinary retention. However, the degree of damage caused by catheter insertion is unusual. Every urologist has experienced (or caused) urethral trauma during catheter insertion. However, trauma leading to irreversible damage, or damage requiring extensive surgery, is and should be very rare. It also calls into question the technique used, and whether catheter insertion should have been stopped and another technique (e.g., cystoscopy, or suprapubic tube insertion) should have been employed.

About the author

Victoria Negron

Victoria Negron

Victoria Negron has extensive experience in journalism and thought leadership in the legal space, with a background crafting content, whitepapers, webinars, and current event articles pertaining to the role of expert witnesses in complex litigation matters. She is a skilled professional specializing in B2B product marketing and content marketing. Currently, she serves as an Enterprise Product Marketing Manager at Postman, and previously held the position of Technical Product Marketing Manager at Palantir Technologies, where she developed her skills in launch strategies, go-to-market strategy, and competitive analysis.

Her expertise in content marketing was further refined during her tenure at the Expert Institute, where she progressed from a Marketing Writer to Senior Content Marketing Manager, and eventually to Associate Director of Content & Product Marketing. In these roles, she honed her abilities in digital marketing, SEO, content strategy, and thought leadership.

Educationally, Victoria holds a Master of Business Administration from the University of Florida - Warrington College of Business and a Bachelor of Arts in Literature, Art, and Hispanic Studies from Hamilton College. Her diverse educational background and professional experience have equipped her with a robust skill set in product marketing, content development, and strategic marketing initiatives.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.