Total Hip Replacement Requires Revision After Six Months

ByMichael Talve, CEO

|

Updated onOctober 27, 2017

Total Hip Replacement Requires Revision After Six Months

This kinesiology case involves a male patient who underwent a ceramic total hip replacement surgery due to degenerative arthritis and chronic hip pain. The patient complained of constant pain at approximately six weeks after the surgery, which was isolated to the gluteal fold region. It also radiated down his hamstring. Less then three months after the initial procedure, the patient underwent an open reduction and internal fixation due to non-union of the trochanteric site. Additionally, a revision procedure of the femoral component was conducted due to device loosening. Five months after his initial procedure, the patient sustained a dislocation of the hip that required a closed reduction. After several other complications, the patient required a total hip revision that was performed six months after his initial hip surgery.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

1. How could this dislocation and revision procedure have been avoided?

Expert Witness Response E-000626

inline imageIt sounds like there was a fracture that went unrecognized for some time, which would be the result of the complication and the need for a revision procedure. Dislocation is the most common complication of hip replacement surgery. At surgery, the femoral head is taken out of the socket, hip implants are placed, and the hip is put back into the proper position. It takes eight to twelve weeks for the soft tissues injured or cut during surgery to heal. During this period, the hip ball can come out of the socket. The chance of this is diminished if less tissue is cut, if the tissue cut is repaired, and if large diameter head balls are used. Surgeons who perform more of the operations each year tend to have fewer patients dislocate. Doing the surgery from an anterior approach seems to lower dislocation rates when small diameter heads are used, but the benefit has not been shown when compared to modern posterior incisions with the use of larger diameter heads. Patients can decrease the risk further by keeping the leg out of certain positions during the first few months after surgery. Use of alcohol by patients during this early period is also associated with an increased rate of dislocation.

About the author

Michael Talve, CEO

Michael Talve, CEO

Michael Talve stands at the forefront of legal innovation as the CEO and Managing Director of Expert Institute. Under his leadership, the Expert Institute has established itself as a vital player in the legal technology arena, revolutionizing how lawyers connect with world-class experts and access advanced legal technology. Michael's role involves not only steering the company's strategic direction but also ensuring the delivery of unparalleled intelligence and cutting-edge solutions to legal professionals. His work at Expert Institute has been instrumental in enhancing the capabilities of attorneys in case preparation and execution, making a significant impact on the legal industry's approach to expert consultation and technological integration. Michael's vision and execution have positioned the Expert Institute as a key facilitator in the intersection of law and technology.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.