Telecommunications Company Fails To Safeguard Payment Systems

ByJohn Lomicky

Updated on

This class action case involves customers of a telecommunications company that had their payment card data and other personally identifiable information stolen by computer hackers. It was alleged that the company failed to upgrade their payment systems to use EMV technology and failed to comply with Federal Trade Commission requirements. It was also alleged that the company failed to provide timely or adequate notice to their customers that their information was compromised. An expert in payment security was sought to opine on the Federal Trade Commission requirements applicable to such companies and how these companies can prevent theft of their customer’s payment data.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

1. What regulatory requirements exist pertaining to the types of payment technology consumer companies should be using?

2. When customer payment data is hacked, what duty does the company have, if any, to inform them of the data breach?

Expert Witness Response E-199662

inline imageI have years of experience in cybersecurity for retail and financial services companies and am very familiar with PCI-DSS, which is the most relevant regulatory requirement pertaining to consumer payment technology. If the company is breached, meaning the exposure of the customers' identifiable information, then the company is required to notify those customers that were impacted. Another common response that companies offer in these instances is to provide identity theft services to those customers for free in an attempt to minimize the potential for class action lawsuits from those impacted. I work in the cybersecurity field day-to-day and have reviewed numerous cases of this nature.

About the author

John Lomicky

John Lomicky

John Lomicky is a J.D. candidate at FSU Law with a multidisciplinary background. He earned his Bachelor's degree in Neurobiology and Near Eastern Studies from Georgetown University and has graduate degrees in International Business and Eurasian Studies. His extensive professional experience includes significant contributions in legal business development and research.

At Expert Institute, John held several key roles over five years, including Director of Business Development, where he oversaw an inside sales team, generating six-figure monthly revenue and fostering relationships with a diverse range of legal practices, including top-tier firms and solo practitioners. As Associate Director of Research, he led the company's first physical expansion, establishing a successful operation in California and managing a team of over 20 research and sales professionals. In his role as Associate in Research, he provided tailored consulting services to attorney clients across North America, connecting them with the right experts for cases in various fields, including personal injury and intellectual property,

John's expertise spans managing sales teams and driving company expansion, developing consultative services tailored to legal practices, and cultivating strong relationships within the legal community.

He is currently pursuing a JD/LLM in Tax at the University of Florida - Fredric G. Levin College of Law, where he is involved with the Florida Tax Moot Court Team and the Low-Income Taxpayer Clinic.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.