A security guard expert witness advises on a case involving a man who was killed outside of a convenience store in Nebraska. Defendant approached the purchase window at a gas station / convenience store. Typically, a lot of customers are in line at the window. Suddenly, another customer attacked the decedent, the plaintiff alleges. The decedent was beaten to death. Store personnel did nothing to try to diffuse the situation, plaintiff alleges.
Additionally, the convenience store chain hired security guards at several stores in the same county, but not at this store. Plaintiff claims this was negligent, as well as the company’s failure to train its employees to respond to a crisis situation.
Plaintiff filed claims for premises liability, respondeat superior, negligent training and supervision and negligent security.
Question(s) For Expert Witness
1. Would a security guard have had a deterrent effect?
2. Was the neighborhood unsafe?
Expert Witness Response
Through my analysis of police reports, I determined that in the five years immediately preceding the assault on the decedent, 337 9-1-1 calls were made from the convenience store. Of those, 54 generated police incident reports, 13 of which were for violent crimes. Adapting this search to a half-mile radius, I determined that in the two years preceding the incident, there were 1,185 police reports generated, 330 of which were for violent offenses.
Breaking my search down even further, I determined that during those two years in a four-square-block radius there were 87 police incident reports, of which 57 were violent, while in a one-block radius there were 34 total police incident reports of which 25 were violent.
Based upon this empirical data, and the demographics of the surrounding area, it is my expert opinion that the convenience store was a high-crime location and was located in a high crime area. The convenience store knew or should have known that significant crime had occurred at its store and in the neighborhood surrounding the store, and that more such crimes were reasonably foreseeable.
Nevertheless, based upon my research and expertise in the field of criminal behavior and the conversations I have had with the perpetrator, it is my expert opinion that had the convenience store hired a security guard the assault on the decedent would not have occurred and he would still be alive today.
About the author
Kristin Casler
Kristin Casler is a seasoned legal writer and journalist with an extensive background in litigation news coverage. For 17 years, she served as the editor for LexisNexis Mealey’s litigation news monitor, a role that positioned her at the forefront of reporting on pivotal legal developments. Her expertise includes covering cases related to the Supreme Court's expert admissibility ruling in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., a critical area in both civil and criminal litigation concerning the challenges of 'junk science' testimony.
Kristin's work primarily involves reporting on a diverse range of legal subjects, with particular emphasis on cases in asbestos litigation, insurance, personal injury, antitrust, mortgage lending, and testimony issues in conviction cases. Her contributions as a journalist have been instrumental in providing in-depth, informed analysis on the evolving landscape of these complex legal areas. Her ability to dissect and communicate intricate legal proceedings and rulings makes her a valuable resource in the legal journalism field.
