The all-you-can-eat-and-drink event at the club included self-serve beer stations. Not only was there no one from the club monitoring the beer stations, there was no one assigned to walk the floor to monitor patrons for signs of intoxication, nor was there any police or other security hired to carry out this task. Some club officers in attendance at the planning meeting could not recall anything being mentioned concerning monitoring patrons. At a minimum, no one member was specifically assigned to monitor the beer stations or the crowd. Thus, the patrons were largely unmonitored in all phases of the event.
The defendant driver was seen drinking at least 10 beers during the event. Witnesses testified that he “drank like a fish” and exhibited bloodshot eyes, loud and obnoxious behavior, slurred speech, and staggering gait. He even admitted that he was drunk. At no time throughout the event did anyone from the club ever approach him to assess his behavior, inquire as to how much liquor he had consumed, suggest that he slow the pace of his drinking, offer or suggest food to him, direct that he have no more alcohol, or remove him from the premises or offer to provide him with a ride home.
The club had essentially no alcohol policies and practices except for one piece of paper that stated a single generic rule about handling intoxicated guests promptly and safely. There was no evidence that any personnel were certified by any recognized alcohol training programs. Nor did the club follow any of the alcohol safety programs provided by its parent organization or the directives of their liability insurance carrier.
Since 1982, the alcohol beverage industry and its regulators have made responsible alcohol service a priority in the United States. The industry has developed several different responsible alcohol server/seller programs to address the issues of underage drinking, drunk driving, and drunkenness. All of these programs advocate responsible alcohol server training in a classroom setting with a focus on a practical section to teach the implementation of those standards. The industry makes it clear that, regardless of the size of or type of the establishment, serving alcohol responsibly is the standard.
The conduct of the club, taken as a whole, was outrageous and showed reckless disregard for the well-known dangers presented by the irresponsible service of alcohol. Any reasonably trained or attentive alcohol server should have immediately seen these signs of evolving intoxication and stopped the service of alcohol to him. The club’s failure to have properly trained and certified employees no doubt played a direct role in their failing to observe and react to the driver’s visible intoxication.