Pacemaker Battery Replacement Causes Cardiac Arrest

Case Overview

This case involves a 61-year-old female with a past medical history of HTN, CAD, CHF, Afib with a status post biventricular ICD implant. The patient underwent a procedure to correct and replace an AICD battery due to pacemaker fuel-cell generator depletion. During the procedure, the patient experienced cardiac and respiratory distress that went unnoticed for a significant time period. When physicians finally uncovered that the patient was unresponsive, CPR was initiated and the patient was transferred to the ICU. The patient suffered from anoxic brain injury and died 3 weeks after the procedure.

Questions to the Electrical expert and their responses

Is this a known complication of this procedure and if so how often does it happen?

Adverse cardiac events may happen during any heart procedure no matter how minor, but this case seems like a few ominous signs went unnoticed for this patient to decompensate so quickly.

About the expert

This expert is a highly qualified cardiologist with over 30 years of experience. He has published and presented numerous articles and papers, and has pursued several major grant funded research endeavors. As the director of clinical cardiology for a large medical center, he is familiar with the clinical circumstances described in this case.

E-004780

Specialties:

Electrical

Michael Talve stands at the forefront of legal innovation as the CEO and Managing Director of Expert Institute. Under his leadership, the Expert Institute has established itself as a vital player in the legal technology arena, revolutionizing how lawyers connect with world-class experts and access advanced legal technology. Michael's role involves not only steering the company's strategic direction but also ensuring the delivery of unparalleled intelligence and cutting-edge solutions to legal professionals. His work at Expert Institute has been instrumental in enhancing the capabilities of attorneys in case preparation and execution, making a significant impact on the legal industry's approach to expert consultation and technological integration. Michael's vision and execution have positioned the Expert Institute as a key facilitator in the intersection of law and technology.