Missed Diagnosis of Intranasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

ByMichael Talve, CEO

Updated on

Missed Diagnosis of Intranasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Case Overview

This case involves a fifty-two-year-old male patient with a history of progressive left nasal obstruction and foreign body sensation that developed acutely over a few months. The patient underwent several endoscopic procedures to evaluate for possible obstruction. An endonasal excision of a left nasal polyp was conducted and a sample was sent to pathology for evaluation. The patient was not followed for eleven months and, in that time, a 1.9cm x 0.9cm mass went unrecognized and untreated. The mass was finally resected a year after the original presentation, but the pathology reports showed that irregular margins were present and the mass fully invaded surrounding tissue. By the time the mass was identified and resected, the patient had developed metastatic squamous cell carcinoma.

Questions to the Radiology expert and their responses

Q1

What is the standard of care in diagnosis of this disease from a radiology perspective?

The criterion standard to evaluate nasal lesions, especially nasal polyposis or sinusitis, is a thin-cut (one to three millimeters) CT scan of the maxillofacial area, the sinuses axially, and the coronal plane. Also, if an intraoperative image-guided system is used, a compatible CT scan should be performed. Plain film radiography has no significant value after polyps are diagnosed. Additionally, performing an MRI in patients with possible intracranial involvement or extension of benign nasal polyps is warranted. CT scan findings and MRI findings can help diagnose the polyp or polyps, define the extent of the lesion in the nasal cavities, sinuses, and beyond, and narrow the differential diagnosis of an unusual polyp or clinical presentation.

About the expert

This board certified diagnostic radiologist has been a clinician for 30 years, and is highly qualified to review this case. He is also a fellow of the American College of Radiology, and has been named as among America's Top Radiologists. Throughout his medical career, he has been appointed to such high ranking clinical positions as the medical director of a major regional healthcare center.

Expert headshot

E-004661

Specialties:

About the author

Michael Talve, CEO

Michael Talve, CEO

Michael Talve stands at the forefront of legal innovation as the CEO and Managing Director of Expert Institute. Under his visionary leadership, the Expert Institute has established itself as a vital player in the legal technology arena, revolutionizing how lawyers connect with world-class experts and access advanced legal technology.

Michael's role encompasses a variety of strategic responsibilities, including steering the company's strategic direction to align with the evolving needs of the legal profession, ensuring the delivery of unparalleled intelligence and cutting-edge solutions to legal professionals, and enhancing the capabilities of attorneys in case preparation and execution.

His work has made a significant impact on the legal industry's approach to expert consultation and technological integration, fostering a culture of innovation and excellence within the field. Michael's vision and execution have positioned the Expert Institute as a key facilitator at the intersection of law and technology, empowering legal practitioners to leverage expert insights for optimal case outcomes.

Michael holds a degree from Babson College.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.