A 59-year-old male patient was admitted to the hospital for treatment for a chronic ulcer on his left foot. The patient was sent for debridement and resection of necrotic tissue and was started on antibiotics post-operatively. The patient was started on high-dose gentamicin and specifically not given any fluoroquinolones due to an inaccurate documentation of an allergy to fluoroquinolones that the patient did not have. As a result of the documentation error, the patient developed severe gentamicin toxicity and now has debilitating neurological and visual disturbances such as vertigo and unsteady gait issues, forcing him to have intensive canalith re-positioning procedures.
Question(s) For Expert Witness
1. Was gentamicin the proper first line choice given the black label side effect profile?
Expert Witness Response E-000983
Gentamicin toxicity is usually permanent but avoidable if the necessary precautions are taken. A number of factors and determinants should be taken into account when using gentamicin, including differentiation between empirical and directed therapy which will affect dosage and treatment period. Many medical practitioners freely administer gentamicin as an antibiotic without advising patients of the severe and permanent potential ramifications of its use. Gentamicin is rarely the only option available and if used, physicians need to follow levels and educate the patient on side effects to stop the drug promptly.
About the author
Michael Talve, CEO
Michael Talve stands at the forefront of legal innovation as the CEO and Managing Director of Expert Institute. Under his leadership, the Expert Institute has established itself as a vital player in the legal technology arena, revolutionizing how lawyers connect with world-class experts and access advanced legal technology. Michael's role involves not only steering the company's strategic direction but also ensuring the delivery of unparalleled intelligence and cutting-edge solutions to legal professionals. His work at Expert Institute has been instrumental in enhancing the capabilities of attorneys in case preparation and execution, making a significant impact on the legal industry's approach to expert consultation and technological integration. Michael's vision and execution have positioned the Expert Institute as a key facilitator in the intersection of law and technology.
