Education Expert Witness Opines on Teacher’s Excessive Punishment

ByMichael Talve, CEO

Updated on

Education Expert Witness Opines on Teacher’s Excessive Punishment

This educational leadership case involves a teacher who duct-taped a student’s mouth shut and placed an index card over it for misbehaving during class. Prior to the act in question, the plaintiff, an eleven-year-old student, was repeatedly reprimanded for talking out of turn. His teacher, the defendant in this case, asked the boy not to shout out answers without first raising his hand. After scolding the student on four separate occasions, the teacher took the boy and placed him in a chair in the corner of the classroom. Here, she placed a piece of duct tape over the boy’s mouth and attached a card to the tape which read, “I will not speak out of turn during class!” The student spent the next thirty minutes sitting in the corner of the classroom before being sent to the principal’s office.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

1. Was the teacher’s punishment excessive?

Expert Witness Response

inline imageWithin their classroom, teachers are typically given a certain amount of leeway when deciding how to handle the various situations that arise. The school should have guidelines on how to properly discipline students and what is considered acceptable punishment when students act out. This usually means sending the child to the principal’s office and, in some cases, contacting the child’s parents. With regards to the circumstances of this case, it appears that the teacher’s actions were excessive, given the risks associated with taping someone’s mouth shut. This could cause breathing issues, in addition to any pain associated with the tape. While these risks may seem minimal, they are largely unnecessary. Teachers are usually instructed to send any child who will not respond to instructions to the principal’s office. By using duct tape on a student, it appears that the teacher went beyond their scope of authority, and may be liable for the modified punishment. A full review of the facts would help illustrate what was done wrong, but the duct tape, alone, seems excessive. I have over thirty years education experience, fifteen in teaching and fifteen in school administration.

About the author

Michael Talve, CEO

Michael Talve, CEO

Michael Talve stands at the forefront of legal innovation as the CEO and Managing Director of Expert Institute. Under his visionary leadership, the Expert Institute has established itself as a vital player in the legal technology arena, revolutionizing how lawyers connect with world-class experts and access advanced legal technology.

Michael's role encompasses a variety of strategic responsibilities, including steering the company's strategic direction to align with the evolving needs of the legal profession, ensuring the delivery of unparalleled intelligence and cutting-edge solutions to legal professionals, and enhancing the capabilities of attorneys in case preparation and execution.

His work has made a significant impact on the legal industry's approach to expert consultation and technological integration, fostering a culture of innovation and excellence within the field. Michael's vision and execution have positioned the Expert Institute as a key facilitator at the intersection of law and technology, empowering legal practitioners to leverage expert insights for optimal case outcomes.

Michael holds a degree from Babson College.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.