Defectively Designed Football Helmet Causes Teenager to Suffer Brain Damage

ByMichael Talve, CEO

|

Updated onJanuary 24, 2022

Defectively Designed Football Helmet Causes Teenager to Suffer Brain Damage

This case involves an allegedly defective football helmet. The plaintiff was engaged in a pre-season high school football practice drill called the “machine gun” or “flipper drill.” In this drill, one defensive player was squared off against a line of offensive players charging at the defensive player. The plaintiff was the defensive player and had to ward off and defeat the offensive players charging at him. The offensive players ran one after another into the plaintiff. The plaintiff took several hits where the offensive players contacted him with their helmets. The plaintiff took several blows in the head from contact between his helmet and the helmets of the offensive players. The plaintiff began to complain of dizziness, headaches, nausea, and vomiting. The plaintiff suffered a loss of his balance later that day. The plaintiff was taken to a hospital where he was diagnosed with a subdural hematoma. This is a life-threatening accumulation of blood on the brain’s surface near the skull. The plaintiff suffered severe brain damage and cannot live without assistance.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

1. Is a football helmet made with a urethane front pad unreasonably dangerous because it may not protect a player from severe head injuries?

Expert Witness Response

inline imageBrain trauma is very common in the game of football, even though players wear helmets. Most brain injuries result from high-impact hits that players take during the game, including hits that can cause the brain to crash into the inside of the skull. The typical football helmet is designed to protect the part of a player’s head that is directly covered by the helmet from direct, linear impact. The front pad of a football helmet protects the player against damage to the face and damage to the skull which can occur when one player uses his helmet to hit another player in the head. Some football helmets have front pads which are made of urethane. These types of helmets have been shown to be ineffective in protecting football players from direct hits because the material does not properly reduce energy increases when its temperature increases. This may lead to brain injuries when a player has a direct impact with another player. The material vinyl nitrate has been shown to be much safer than urethane in preventing brain injuries when it is used in the front pads of football helmets. Vinyl nitrate has been shown to be better at absorbing the force or impact from a direct hit that a player may take and is generally considered much safer material than urethane padding in a football helmet.

About the author

Michael Talve, CEO

Michael Talve, CEO

Michael Talve stands at the forefront of legal innovation as the CEO and Managing Director of Expert Institute. Under his leadership, the Expert Institute has established itself as a vital player in the legal technology arena, revolutionizing how lawyers connect with world-class experts and access advanced legal technology. Michael's role involves not only steering the company's strategic direction but also ensuring the delivery of unparalleled intelligence and cutting-edge solutions to legal professionals. His work at Expert Institute has been instrumental in enhancing the capabilities of attorneys in case preparation and execution, making a significant impact on the legal industry's approach to expert consultation and technological integration. Michael's vision and execution have positioned the Expert Institute as a key facilitator in the intersection of law and technology.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?