Mr. Stan Kephart has over 30 years of experience in security and law enforcement. He earned his BA and MA from the University of San Francisco. He is a member of various organizations including the American Probation and Parole Association and the American Society for Industrial Security. He has previously served as the vice president of public safety at Unuson Corporation, the security administration of the Los Angeles Olympic Organizing Committee, the dean of the Administration of Justice and the director of the police academy of the Riverside Community College. This expert has also worked as the chief probation officer of Tulare County, the public safety director and chief of police of the Cabazon Band of Mission Indians Tribal Police Department, and the chief of police for the Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community. This expert currently serves as the CEO of a security system company and as a security consultant of his own practice that serves California, Arizona, and Florida.
s******@p*****.com
(602) ***-****
Phoenix, Arizona
At a Glance
Expert Witness Activity
Plaintiff Cases
Defense Cases
Expert Challenges
Deposition Transcripts
Publications
Media & News
Social Media Mentions
Expert Institute operates independently and objectively as an expert witness data provider. Expert witness profiling focuses on individuals involved in publicly disclosed litigation. Expert Institute does not employ, endorse, or suggest an affiliation with any individuals for whom data is available.
Case Name | Role | Filed Date |
---|
Defense
Plaintiff
0
25
50
75
100
2000
0
2002
0
2004
0
2006
0
2008
0
2010
0
2001-2009
2001-2009
2001-2009
2001-2009
2001-2009
2001-2009
2001-2009
2001-2019
0
25
50
75
100
0
25
50
75
100
See their litigation activity, risk and credibility history
Using Expert Radar, we uncovered a textbook chapter written by the opposing expert that contradicted his testimony, helping us secure a $44 million verdict—the largest single verdict for a single plaintiff in Kentucky's history.
Mark Alcott, Esq.
Harlin Parker
Contradictory statements in testimony
Misrepresentations in CVs, online profiles / bios, LinkedIn
Biases in expert witness experience
Financial ties with organizations they represent